Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SLMCX vs TEFQX
SLMCX vs TEFQX Comparison
Open Charts SLMCX vs TEFQX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$136.81
Change+$0.41 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.09B
Firsthand Technology Opportunities
Price$5.07
Change+$0.03 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.55M
SLMCX vs TEFQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLMCX vs. TEFQX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLMCX is a Buy and TEFQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. TEFQX (53.5M). SLMCX (0.00) and TEFQX (0.00) have matching dividends . SLMCX was incepted earlier than TEFQX: SLMCX (42 years) vs TEFQX (26 years). TEFQX (1.87) is less costly to investors than SLMCX (1.18). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. TEFQX (14.00). SLMCX (2000) and TEFQX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TEFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.86 vs. SLMCX (9.74). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.07 vs. TEFQX (-68.70).
| SLMCX | TEFQX | SLMCX / TEFQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.85 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.87 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.967 | 33.773 | 30% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1B | 53.5M | 28,224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.74 | 44.86 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.33 | -40.42 | -102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.07 | -68.70 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.09 | -45.19 | -288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement