SLGGF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
616.31M
SMDZF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
21.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLGGF vs SMDZF

Header iconSLGGF vs SMDZF Comparison
Open Charts SLGGF vs SMDZFBanner chart's image
Solgold
Price$0.20
Change-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Volume$68K
Capitalization616.31M
Strategic Metals Ltd. New
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$109.4K
Capitalization21.49M
SLGGF vs SMDZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLGGF vs. SMDZF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLGGF is a Hold and SMDZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (SLGGF: $0.20 vs. SMDZF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: SLGGF and SMDZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLGGF: 36% vs. SMDZF: 217%
Market capitalization -- SLGGF: $616.31M vs. SMDZF: $21.49M
SLGGF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $616.31M. SMDZF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $21.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLGGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMDZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SLGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMDZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLGGF is a better buy in the long-term than SMDZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLGGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMDZF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLGGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMDZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SLGGF and SMDZF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SLGGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -11.06% price change this week, while SMDZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +13.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLGGF($616M) has a higher market cap than SMDZF($21.5M). SLGGF YTD gains are higher at: 151.250 vs. SMDZF (94.059). SMDZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.73M vs. SLGGF (-36.74M). SLGGF has more cash in the bank: 13.2M vs. SMDZF (6.14M). SLGGF (0) and SMDZF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SLGGFSMDZFSLGGF / SMDZF
Capitalization616M21.5M2,865%
EBITDA-36.74M-1.73M2,126%
Gain YTD151.25094.059161%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash13.2M6.14M215%
Total Debt200MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLGGF vs SMDZF: Fundamental Ratings
SLGGF
SMDZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9692
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3736
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLGGF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SMDZF (59). This means that SLGGF’s stock grew similarly to SMDZF’s over the last 12 months.

SLGGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SMDZF (100). This means that SLGGF’s stock grew similarly to SMDZF’s over the last 12 months.

SMDZF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as SLGGF (96). This means that SMDZF’s stock grew similarly to SLGGF’s over the last 12 months.

SMDZF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SLGGF (37). This means that SMDZF’s stock grew similarly to SLGGF’s over the last 12 months.

SMDZF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SLGGF (100). This means that SMDZF’s stock grew similarly to SLGGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLGGFSMDZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMVSX37.270.48
+1.30%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value I
NBRCX27.640.31
+1.13%
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val C
ITETX10.040.09
+0.90%
VY® T. Rowe Price Equity Income S2
EIHSX13.020.09
+0.70%
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci I
SASMX38.140.20
+0.53%
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth A

SLGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLGGF and CTXDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLGGF and CTXDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLGGF
1D Price
Change %
SLGGF100%
-4.29%
CTXDF - SLGGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
EMGDF - SLGGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
BRYGF - SLGGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHERF - SLGGF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOUHY - SLGGF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
More

SMDZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMDZF and SYAAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMDZF and SYAAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMDZF
1D Price
Change %
SMDZF100%
+1.79%
SYAAF - SMDZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
OMZNF - SMDZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
MJDLF - SMDZF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
SHTLF - SMDZF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLGGF - SMDZF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.29%
More