SLFPY
Price
$10.78
Change
+$0.74 (+7.37%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.79B
URNAF
Price
$4.69
Change
-$0.01 (-0.21%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
127.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLFPY vs URNAF

Header iconSLFPY vs URNAF Comparison
Open Charts SLFPY vs URNAFBanner chart's image
Aberdeen Group
Price$10.78
Change+$0.74 (+7.37%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization5.79B
Urbana
Price$4.69
Change-$0.01 (-0.21%)
Volume$1.28K
Capitalization127.58M
SLFPY vs URNAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
URNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLFPY vs. URNAF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLFPY is a Hold and URNAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SLFPY: $10.78 vs. URNAF: $4.69)
Brand notoriety: SLFPY and URNAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLFPY: 105% vs. URNAF: 70%
Market capitalization -- SLFPY: $5.79B vs. URNAF: $127.58M
SLFPY [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.79B. URNAF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $127.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLFPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileURNAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SLFPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • URNAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, URNAF is a better buy in the long-term than SLFPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLFPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while URNAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLFPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • URNAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPY is a better buy in the short-term than URNAF.

Price Growth

SLFPY (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.70% price change this week, while URNAF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLFPY($5.79B) has a higher market cap than URNAF($128M). URNAF has higher P/E ratio than SLFPY: URNAF (8.86) vs SLFPY (7.89). SLFPY YTD gains are higher at: 59.491 vs. URNAF (19.640). SLFPY has higher revenues than URNAF: SLFPY (2.31B) vs URNAF (-6.33M).
SLFPYURNAFSLFPY / URNAF
Capitalization5.79B128M4,523%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD59.49119.640303%
P/E Ratio7.898.8689%
Revenue2.31B-6.33M-36,528%
Total CashN/A2.05M-
Total DebtN/A36.1M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLFPY vs URNAF: Fundamental Ratings
SLFPY
URNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
873
SMR RATING
1..100
5261
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1009
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLFPY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as URNAF (37). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew similarly to URNAF’s over the last 12 months.

URNAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLFPY (87). This means that URNAF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as URNAF (61). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew similarly to URNAF’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as URNAF (49). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew similarly to URNAF’s over the last 12 months.

URNAF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLFPY (100). This means that URNAF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLFPYURNAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
URNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAGFX11.480.16
+1.41%
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth R6
HBSGX26.290.31
+1.19%
Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS IB
PDFDX47.320.42
+0.90%
Perkins Discovery
BGRIX93.370.62
+0.67%
Baron Growth Instl
MAMEX21.380.14
+0.66%
MoA Mid Cap Equity Index Fund

SLFPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPY and OWL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPY and OWL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPY
1D Price
Change %
SLFPY100%
+7.36%
OWL - SLFPY
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
BLK - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
CNS - SLFPY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
SLFPF - SLFPY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - SLFPY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More

URNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that URNAF and WNDLF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that URNAF and WNDLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To URNAF
1D Price
Change %
URNAF100%
N/A
WNDLF - URNAF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UBAAF - URNAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOLCF - URNAF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
SLFPY - URNAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+7.36%
SVCTF - URNAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More