SLFPY
Price
$10.78
Change
+$0.74 (+7.37%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.79B
TRRPF
Price
$0.43
Change
+$0.04 (+10.26%)
Updated
May 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLFPY vs TRRPF

Header iconSLFPY vs TRRPF Comparison
Open Charts SLFPY vs TRRPFBanner chart's image
Aberdeen Group
Price$10.78
Change+$0.74 (+7.37%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization5.79B
Torrent Cap
Price$0.43
Change+$0.04 (+10.26%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization12.04M
SLFPY vs TRRPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLFPY vs. TRRPF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLFPY is a Hold and TRRPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SLFPY: $10.78 vs. TRRPF: $0.43)
Brand notoriety: SLFPY and TRRPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLFPY: 105% vs. TRRPF: 108%
Market capitalization -- SLFPY: $5.79B vs. TRRPF: $12.04M
SLFPY [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.79B. TRRPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $12.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLFPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRRPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLFPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRRPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPY is a better buy in the long-term than TRRPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLFPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRRPF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLFPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TRRPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPY is a better buy in the short-term than TRRPF.

Price Growth

SLFPY (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.70% price change this week, while TRRPF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLFPY($5.79B) has a higher market cap than TRRPF($12M). TRRPF has higher P/E ratio than SLFPY: TRRPF (16.92) vs SLFPY (7.89). SLFPY YTD gains are higher at: 59.491 vs. TRRPF (-4.578). SLFPY has higher revenues than TRRPF: SLFPY (2.31B) vs TRRPF (-7.72M).
SLFPYTRRPFSLFPY / TRRPF
Capitalization5.79B12M48,242%
EBITDAN/A-9.23M-
Gain YTD59.491-4.578-1,300%
P/E Ratio7.8916.9247%
Revenue2.31B-7.72M-29,964%
Total CashN/A20.6M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLFPY vs TRRPF: Fundamental Ratings
SLFPY
TRRPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8775
SMR RATING
1..100
5289
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10017
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLFPY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRRPF (77). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew significantly faster than TRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

TRRPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPY (87). This means that TRRPF’s stock grew similarly to SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRRPF (89). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as TRRPF (60). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew similarly to TRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

TRRPF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLFPY (100). This means that TRRPF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLFPYTRRPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFVX70.030.48
+0.69%
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF
SIXP29.420.12
+0.39%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Mar/Sep ETF
SHM47.780.02
+0.04%
SPDR Nuveen ICE Short Term Muncpl Bd ETF
MAYU29.02N/A
N/A
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Unc May ETF
LDSF18.98-0.01
-0.05%
First Trust Low Dur Strat Foc ETF

SLFPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPY and OWL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPY and OWL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPY
1D Price
Change %
SLFPY100%
+7.36%
OWL - SLFPY
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
BLK - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
CNS - SLFPY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
SLFPF - SLFPY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - SLFPY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More

TRRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRRPF has been loosely correlated with BENF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRRPF jumps, then BENF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRRPF
1D Price
Change %
TRRPF100%
N/A
BENF - TRRPF
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.05%
TPVG - TRRPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLFPY - TRRPF
12%
Poorly correlated
+7.36%
UBAAF - TRRPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOLCF - TRRPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
More