SLFPF
Price
$2.57
Change
+$0.04 (+1.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.5B
SLFPY
Price
$10.62
Change
-$0.32 (-2.93%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
4.5B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLFPF vs SLFPY

Header iconSLFPF vs SLFPY Comparison
Open Charts SLFPF vs SLFPYBanner chart's image
ABERDEEN GROUP
Price$2.57
Change+$0.04 (+1.58%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization4.5B
ABERDEEN GROUP
Price$10.62
Change-$0.32 (-2.93%)
Volume$124
Capitalization4.5B
SLFPF vs SLFPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLFPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLFPF vs. SLFPY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLFPF is a Hold and SLFPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SLFPF: $2.57 vs. SLFPY: $10.62)
Brand notoriety: SLFPF and SLFPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLFPF: 52% vs. SLFPY: 14%
Market capitalization -- SLFPF: $4.5B vs. SLFPY: $4.5B
SLFPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.5B. SLFPY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLFPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLFPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SLFPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLFPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SLFPF and SLFPY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLFPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLFPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLFPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLFPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPF is a better buy in the short-term than SLFPY.

Price Growth

SLFPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.20% price change this week, while SLFPY (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.28% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLFPF($4.5B) and SLFPY($4.5B) have the same market capitalization . SLFPY (11.35) and SLFPF (10.99) have similar P/E ratio . SLFPY YTD gains are higher at: 62.914 vs. SLFPF (45.198).
SLFPFSLFPYSLFPF / SLFPY
Capitalization4.5B4.5B100%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD45.19862.91472%
P/E Ratio10.9911.3597%
Revenue1.68BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt546MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLFPF vs SLFPY: Fundamental Ratings
SLFPF
SLFPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
6262
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2824
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
48n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLFPF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPY (9). This means that SLFPF’s stock grew similarly to SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPF (100). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew similarly to SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPF (62). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew similarly to SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPF (50). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew similarly to SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPF (28). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew similarly to SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLFPFSLFPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLFPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAVI75.410.04
+0.05%
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF
IBHH23.770.01
+0.04%
iShares iBonds 2028 Term HY & Inc ETF
PYT23.03N/A
N/A
Merrill Lynch Depositor PPLUS Floating Rate Call TR Cert Ser GSC-2(Goldman Sachs)
OCTD24.24N/A
N/A
Innovator Premium Income 10 Bar ETF Oct
DVOL34.90-0.27
-0.76%
FirstTrustDorseyWrightMomt&LwVolatil ETF

SLFPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPF and SLFPY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPF and SLFPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPF
1D Price
Change %
SLFPF100%
+1.78%
SLFPY - SLFPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - SLFPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
BENF - SLFPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
STJPF - SLFPF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUILF - SLFPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLFPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPY and OWL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPY and OWL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPY
1D Price
Change %
SLFPY100%
N/A
OWL - SLFPY
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
BLK - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
CNS - SLFPY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
SLFPF - SLFPY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
LGGNY - SLFPY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More