SLF vs SUND
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLF is a Hold and SUND is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSUND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SUND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -4.23% price change this week, while SUND (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -16.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -2.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
SLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Multi-Line Insurance (-2.88% weekly)A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
| SLF | SUND | SLF / SUND | |
| Capitalization | 31.6B | 15.3M | 206,536% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -3.04M | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.148 | -56.811 | -21% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.86 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 32.7B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 27.5B | 3.16K | 870,804,307% |
| Total Debt | 13.3B | 3.26M | 408,602% |
SLF | SUND | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 42 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SLF's Valuation (30) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUND (90) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUND’s over the last 12 months.
SLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUND (100) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUND’s over the last 12 months.
SLF's SMR Rating (98) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SUND (100) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew similarly to SUND’s over the last 12 months.
SLF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUND (83) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUND’s over the last 12 months.
SLF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SUND (76) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew similarly to SUND’s over the last 12 months.
| SLF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% |
SLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLF has been loosely correlated with FIHL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLF jumps, then FIHL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLF | 100% | -2.27% | ||
| FIHL - SLF | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.69% | ||
| AIG - SLF | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
| EQH - SLF | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.75% | ||
| ESGR - SLF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| AVVIY - SLF | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.49% | ||
More | ||||
SUND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SUND and SLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUND and SLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUND | 100% | -7.14% | ||
| SLF - SUND | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.27% | ||
| MPFRF - SUND | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SAXPY - SUND | 4% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
| NNGRY - SUND | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
| SAXPF - SUND | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||