SKVI
Price
$0.25
Change
+$0.11 (+78.57%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.35M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SSDOF
Price
$17.06
Change
+$0.53 (+3.21%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
6.97B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SKVI vs SSDOF

Header iconSKVI vs SSDOF Comparison
Open Charts SKVI vs SSDOFBanner chart's image
Skinvisible
Price$0.25
Change+$0.11 (+78.57%)
Volume$958
Capitalization1.35M
Shiseido
Price$17.06
Change+$0.53 (+3.21%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.97B
SKVI vs SSDOF Comparison Chart in %
SKVI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSDOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SKVI vs. SSDOF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SKVI is a Hold and SSDOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (SKVI: $0.25 vs. SSDOF: $17.15)
Brand notoriety: SKVI and SSDOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SKVI: 21% vs. SSDOF: 707%
Market capitalization -- SKVI: $1.35M vs. SSDOF: $6.97B
SKVI [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $1.35M. SSDOF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $6.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $360.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SKVI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSSDOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SKVI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SSDOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSDOF is a better buy in the long-term than SKVI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SKVI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSDOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SKVI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SSDOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SKVI is a better buy in the short-term than SSDOF.

Price Growth

SKVI (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -37.50% price change this week, while SSDOF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.26% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSDOF($6.97B) has a higher market cap than SKVI($1.35M). SSDOF YTD gains are higher at: 13.953 vs. SKVI (8.413). SSDOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94.5B vs. SKVI (126K). SSDOF has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. SKVI (645). SKVI has less debt than SSDOF: SKVI (5.77M) vs SSDOF (338B). SSDOF has higher revenues than SKVI: SSDOF (952B) vs SKVI (20K).
SKVISSDOFSKVI / SSDOF
Capitalization1.35M6.97B0%
EBITDA126K94.5B0%
Gain YTD8.41313.95360%
P/E RatioN/A576.93-
Revenue20K952B0%
Total Cash645107B0%
Total Debt5.77M338B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SKVI vs SSDOF: Fundamental Ratings
SKVI
SSDOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SKVI's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as SSDOF (92). This means that SKVI’s stock grew similarly to SSDOF’s over the last 12 months.

SKVI's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as SSDOF (100). This means that SKVI’s stock grew similarly to SSDOF’s over the last 12 months.

SKVI's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SSDOF (100). This means that SKVI’s stock grew similarly to SSDOF’s over the last 12 months.

SKVI's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SSDOF (52). This means that SKVI’s stock grew similarly to SSDOF’s over the last 12 months.

SSDOF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SKVI (100). This means that SSDOF’s stock grew significantly faster than SKVI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SKVISSDOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SKVI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSDOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHLAX35.06-0.21
-0.60%
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences A
PZFVX19.34-0.12
-0.62%
JHancock Classic Value A
RSIPX15.11-0.18
-1.18%
Columbia Disciplined Core Inst2
REDWX17.34-0.26
-1.48%
GreenFi Redwood Fund
CGFAX78.09-1.45
-1.82%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A

SKVI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SKVI and SSDOF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKVI and SSDOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKVI
1D Price
Change %
SKVI100%
-37.50%
SSDOF - SKVI
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PZCUY - SKVI
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PURE - SKVI
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
SSDOY - SKVI
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
UNICY - SKVI
-4%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
More

SSDOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSDOF has been loosely correlated with EL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSDOF jumps, then EL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSDOF
1D Price
Change %
SSDOF100%
N/A
EL - SSDOF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
KSRYY - SSDOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSDOY - SSDOF
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
SKVI - SSDOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-37.50%
UNICY - SSDOF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
More