SKVI
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.02 (+9.52%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.24M
SSDOF
Price
$17.06
Change
+$1.61 (+10.42%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.47B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SKVI vs SSDOF

Header iconSKVI vs SSDOF Comparison
Open Charts SKVI vs SSDOFBanner chart's image
Skinvisible
Price$0.23
Change+$0.02 (+9.52%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization1.24M
Shiseido
Price$17.06
Change+$1.61 (+10.42%)
Volume$300
Capitalization6.47B
SKVI vs SSDOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SKVI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSDOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SKVI vs. SSDOF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SKVI is a Hold and SSDOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SKVI: $0.23 vs. SSDOF: $17.06)
Brand notoriety: SKVI and SSDOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SKVI: 25% vs. SSDOF: 7%
Market capitalization -- SKVI: $1.24M vs. SSDOF: $6.47B
SKVI [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $1.24M. SSDOF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $6.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $374.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $22.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SKVI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSSDOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SKVI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SSDOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSDOF is a better buy in the long-term than SKVI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SKVI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSDOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SKVI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SSDOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SSDOF is a better buy in the short-term than SKVI.

Price Growth

SKVI (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +47.56% price change this week, while SSDOF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.47% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSDOF($6.47B) has a higher market cap than SKVI($1.24M). SSDOF YTD gains are higher at: -10.211 vs. SKVI (-31.780). SSDOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94.5B vs. SKVI (114K). SSDOF has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. SKVI (120). SKVI has less debt than SSDOF: SKVI (5.75M) vs SSDOF (338B). SSDOF has higher revenues than SKVI: SSDOF (952B) vs SKVI (20K).
SKVISSDOFSKVI / SSDOF
Capitalization1.24M6.47B0%
EBITDA114K94.5B0%
Gain YTD-31.780-10.211311%
P/E RatioN/A576.93-
Revenue20K952B0%
Total Cash120107B0%
Total Debt5.75M338B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SKVI vs SSDOF: Fundamental Ratings
SKVI
SSDOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SKVI's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as SSDOF (94). This means that SKVI’s stock grew similarly to SSDOF’s over the last 12 months.

SKVI's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as SSDOF (100). This means that SKVI’s stock grew similarly to SSDOF’s over the last 12 months.

SKVI's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SSDOF (100). This means that SKVI’s stock grew similarly to SSDOF’s over the last 12 months.

SSDOF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SKVI (64). This means that SSDOF’s stock grew similarly to SKVI’s over the last 12 months.

SSDOF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SKVI (100). This means that SSDOF’s stock grew significantly faster than SKVI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SKVISSDOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SKVI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSDOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMOM31.200.26
+0.83%
Cambria Global Momentum ETF
FNY88.740.45
+0.51%
First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX® ETF
OVS35.550.12
+0.33%
Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF
GSY50.270.02
+0.04%
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
MUSE50.18N/A
N/A
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF

SKVI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SKVI and SSDOF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKVI and SSDOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKVI
1D Price
Change %
SKVI100%
+9.48%
SSDOF - SKVI
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PZCUY - SKVI
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBGLY - SKVI
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
RBGPF - SKVI
1%
Poorly correlated
+5.53%
PURE - SKVI
0%
Poorly correlated
+6.18%
More

SSDOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSDOF and TANH have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSDOF and TANH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSDOF
1D Price
Change %
SSDOF100%
N/A
TANH - SSDOF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.35%
KSRYY - SSDOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSDOY - SSDOF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
SKVI - SSDOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+9.48%
PZCUY - SSDOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More