SKHRF
Price
$0.53
Change
+$0.03 (+6.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
9.79M
WFRSF
Price
$1.84
Change
+$0.12 (+6.98%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SKHRF vs WFRSF

Header iconSKHRF vs WFRSF Comparison
Open Charts SKHRF vs WFRSFBanner chart's image
Stakeholder Gold
Price$0.53
Change+$0.03 (+6.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization9.79M
West African Resources
Price$1.84
Change+$0.12 (+6.98%)
Volume$8.17K
Capitalization1.99B
SKHRF vs WFRSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SKHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SKHRF vs. WFRSF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SKHRF is a Hold and WFRSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (SKHRF: $0.53 vs. WFRSF: $1.84)
Brand notoriety: SKHRF and WFRSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SKHRF: 42% vs. WFRSF: 90%
Market capitalization -- SKHRF: $9.79M vs. WFRSF: $1.99B
SKHRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $9.79M. WFRSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SKHRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWFRSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SKHRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WFRSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WFRSF is a better buy in the long-term than SKHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SKHRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFRSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SKHRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WFRSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SKHRF and WFRSF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SKHRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.00% price change this week, while WFRSF (@Precious Metals) price change was +31.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFRSF($1.99B) has a higher market cap than SKHRF($9.79M). SKHRF has higher P/E ratio than WFRSF: SKHRF (40.20) vs WFRSF (13.74). WFRSF YTD gains are higher at: 102.198 vs. SKHRF (-17.146). WFRSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 420M vs. SKHRF (-2.57M). WFRSF has more cash in the bank: 392M vs. SKHRF (303K). WFRSF has higher revenues than SKHRF: WFRSF (724M) vs SKHRF (1.16M).
SKHRFWFRSFSKHRF / WFRSF
Capitalization9.79M1.99B0%
EBITDA-2.57M420M-1%
Gain YTD-17.146102.198-17%
P/E Ratio40.2013.74293%
Revenue1.16M724M0%
Total Cash303K392M0%
Total DebtN/A426M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SKHRF vs WFRSF: Fundamental Ratings
SKHRF
WFRSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9026
SMR RATING
1..100
9843
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7813
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFRSF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as SKHRF (79). This means that WFRSF’s stock grew similarly to SKHRF’s over the last 12 months.

WFRSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SKHRF (90). This means that WFRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SKHRF’s over the last 12 months.

WFRSF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SKHRF (98). This means that WFRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SKHRF’s over the last 12 months.

WFRSF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SKHRF (60). This means that WFRSF’s stock grew similarly to SKHRF’s over the last 12 months.

WFRSF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SKHRF (78). This means that WFRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SKHRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SKHRFWFRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SKHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SONO11.330.36
+3.28%
Sonos
BGKKF4.30N/A
N/A
Bangkok Bank Public Co Ltd.
UNEGF0.04N/A
N/A
United Energy Group, Ltd.
WILC21.28-0.13
-0.61%
G Willi-Food International Ltd
RGS19.42-0.33
-1.67%
Regis Corp

SKHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SKHRF and WFRSF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKHRF and WFRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKHRF
1D Price
Change %
SKHRF100%
+5.44%
WFRSF - SKHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
+7.29%
SNWGF - SKHRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
GUYGF - SKHRF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
NFLDF - SKHRF
-7%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
RYES - SKHRF
-15%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%

WFRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WFRSF and SKHRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WFRSF and SKHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFRSF
1D Price
Change %
WFRSF100%
+7.29%
SKHRF - WFRSF
28%
Poorly correlated
+5.44%
VLMZF - WFRSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AEM - WFRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
EOGSF - WFRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
BTG - WFRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.53%
More