SKHRF
Price
$0.53
Change
+$0.03 (+6.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
9.79M
SNWGF
Price
$6.90
Change
-$0.23 (-3.23%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SKHRF vs SNWGF

Header iconSKHRF vs SNWGF Comparison
Open Charts SKHRF vs SNWGFBanner chart's image
Stakeholder Gold
Price$0.53
Change+$0.03 (+6.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization9.79M
SNOWLINE GOLD
Price$6.90
Change-$0.23 (-3.23%)
Volume$145.72K
Capitalization1.11B
SKHRF vs SNWGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SKHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNWGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SKHRF vs. SNWGF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SKHRF is a Hold and SNWGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (SKHRF: $0.53 vs. SNWGF: $6.90)
Brand notoriety: SKHRF and SNWGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SKHRF: 42% vs. SNWGF: 111%
Market capitalization -- SKHRF: $10.06M vs. SNWGF: $1.09B
SKHRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $10.06M. SNWGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $75.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SKHRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNWGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SKHRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNWGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNWGF is a better buy in the long-term than SKHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SKHRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNWGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SKHRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SNWGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SKHRF is a better buy in the short-term than SNWGF.

Price Growth

SKHRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.00% price change this week, while SNWGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNWGF($1.11B) has a higher market cap than SKHRF($9.79M). SNWGF YTD gains are higher at: 92.670 vs. SKHRF (-17.146). SKHRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.57M vs. SNWGF (-29.63M). SNWGF has more cash in the bank: 42M vs. SKHRF (303K). SKHRF has higher revenues than SNWGF: SKHRF (1.16M) vs SNWGF (0).
SKHRFSNWGFSKHRF / SNWGF
Capitalization9.79M1.11B1%
EBITDA-2.57M-29.63M9%
Gain YTD-17.14692.670-19%
P/E Ratio40.20N/A-
Revenue1.16M0-
Total Cash303K42M1%
Total DebtN/A42.5K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SKHRF: Fundamental Ratings
SKHRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SKHRFSNWGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SKHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNWGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SONO11.330.36
+3.28%
Sonos
BGKKF4.30N/A
N/A
Bangkok Bank Public Co Ltd.
UNEGF0.04N/A
N/A
United Energy Group, Ltd.
WILC21.28-0.13
-0.61%
G Willi-Food International Ltd
RGS19.42-0.33
-1.67%
Regis Corp

SKHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SKHRF and WFRSF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKHRF and WFRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKHRF
1D Price
Change %
SKHRF100%
+5.44%
WFRSF - SKHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
+7.29%
SNWGF - SKHRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
GUYGF - SKHRF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
NFLDF - SKHRF
-7%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
RYES - SKHRF
-15%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%

SNWGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNWGF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNWGF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNWGF
1D Price
Change %
SNWGF100%
-3.23%
TORXF - SNWGF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
LUGDF - SNWGF
36%
Loosely correlated
+6.43%
ORZCF - SNWGF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
KNTNF - SNWGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
PROBF - SNWGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More