SITKF
Price
$0.38
Change
-$0.01 (-2.56%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
15.99M
SLVMF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
172.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SITKF vs SLVMF

Header iconSITKF vs SLVMF Comparison
Open Charts SITKF vs SLVMFBanner chart's image
Sitka Gold
Price$0.38
Change-$0.01 (-2.56%)
Volume$76.06K
Capitalization15.99M
Silver Mines Ltd., Sydney
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$127.04K
Capitalization172.99M
SITKF vs SLVMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SITKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SITKF vs. SLVMF commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SITKF is a StrongBuy and SLVMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (SITKF: $0.35)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SITKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • SITKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SITKF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SITKF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

SITKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.52% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVMF($173M) has a higher market cap than SITKF($16M). SLVMF YTD gains are higher at: 59.389 vs. SITKF (39.054). SITKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.11M vs. SLVMF (-7.48M). SLVMF has more cash in the bank: 12.1M vs. SITKF (3.02M). SITKF has less debt than SLVMF: SITKF (40K) vs SLVMF (4.91M). SLVMF has higher revenues than SITKF: SLVMF (159K) vs SITKF (0).
SITKFSLVMFSITKF / SLVMF
Capitalization16M173M9%
EBITDA-1.11M-7.48M15%
Gain YTD39.05459.38966%
P/E RatioN/A55.56-
Revenue0159K-
Total Cash3.02M12.1M25%
Total Debt40K4.91M1%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SITKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SITKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

SITKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SITKF and BYAGF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SITKF and BYAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SITKF
1D Price
Change %
SITKF100%
+6.87%
BYAGF - SITKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
SLVMF - SITKF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.29%
PMDRF - SITKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBMCF - SITKF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.17%
KDKCF - SITKF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.09%
More

SLVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVMF and AUMBF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVMF and AUMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVMF
1D Price
Change %
SLVMF100%
+4.29%
AUMBF - SLVMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
BYAGF - SLVMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
ELRRF - SLVMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
CRTIF - SLVMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVGLF - SLVMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More