SITIY
Price
$39.38
Change
-$1.12 (-2.77%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
10.58B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLOFF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
469.92M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SITIY vs SLOFF

Header iconSITIY vs SLOFF Comparison
Open Charts SITIY vs SLOFFBanner chart's image
SITC International Holdings
Price$39.38
Change-$1.12 (-2.77%)
Volume$347
Capitalization10.58B
Solstad Farstad ASA
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$120
Capitalization469.92M
SITIY vs SLOFF Comparison Chart in %
SITIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SITIY vs. SLOFF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SITIY is a StrongBuy and SLOFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (SITIY: $39.38 vs. SLOFF: $3.01)
Brand notoriety: SITIY and SLOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SITIY: 100% vs. SLOFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SITIY: $10.58B vs. SLOFF: $469.92M
SITIY [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $10.58B. SLOFF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $469.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SITIY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSLOFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SITIY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SLOFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SITIY is a better buy in the long-term than SLOFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SITIY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SITIY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

SITIY (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +6.07% price change this week, while SLOFF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+1.42% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SITIY($10.6B) has a higher market cap than SLOFF($470M). SLOFF has higher P/E ratio than SITIY: SLOFF (237.91) vs SITIY (8.20). SITIY YTD gains are higher at: 97.108 vs. SLOFF (0.000). SITIY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.35B vs. SLOFF (197M). SITIY has more cash in the bank: 799M vs. SLOFF (59.7M). SITIY has less debt than SLOFF: SITIY (328M) vs SLOFF (433M). SITIY has higher revenues than SLOFF: SITIY (3.42B) vs SLOFF (236M).
SITIYSLOFFSITIY / SLOFF
Capitalization10.6B470M2,255%
EBITDA1.35B197M686%
Gain YTD97.1080.000-
P/E Ratio8.20237.913%
Revenue3.42B236M1,450%
Total Cash799M59.7M1,338%
Total Debt328M433M76%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SITIY vs SLOFF: Fundamental Ratings
SITIY
SLOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3034
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16100
SMR RATING
1..100
1819
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3869
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
804
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SITIY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLOFF (91). This means that SITIY’s stock grew significantly faster than SLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

SITIY's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLOFF (100). This means that SITIY’s stock grew significantly faster than SLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

SITIY's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as SLOFF (19). This means that SITIY’s stock grew similarly to SLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

SITIY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SLOFF (69). This means that SITIY’s stock grew similarly to SLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

SLOFF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SITIY (80). This means that SLOFF’s stock grew significantly faster than SITIY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SITIYSLOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SITIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSIPX15.070.16
+1.07%
State Street International Stock Sel I
LISIX16.500.05
+0.30%
Lazard International Strategic Eq Instl
RUNTX26.87N/A
N/A
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity M
FEMYX14.74N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Sustainable Emerg Mkts
TILGX33.55-0.08
-0.24%
Nuveen Large Cap Growth R6

SITIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SITIY and PTAUY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SITIY and PTAUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SITIY
1D Price
Change %
SITIY100%
N/A
PTAUY - SITIY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOY - SITIY
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
ZIM - SITIY
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
HUPHY - SITIY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLOFF - SITIY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLOFF has been loosely correlated with IRCUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLOFF jumps, then IRCUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLOFF
1D Price
Change %
SLOFF100%
N/A
IRCUF - SLOFF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SEMUF - SLOFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HUPHY - SLOFF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPBSF - SLOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTAUY - SLOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More