SIREF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
SMDRF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

SIREF vs SMDRF

Header iconSIREF vs SMDRF Comparison
Open Charts SIREF vs SMDRFBanner chart's image
Sirios Resources
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.9K
CapitalizationN/A
Sierra Madre Gold and Silver
Price$0.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$31.36K
CapitalizationN/A
SIREF vs SMDRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SIREF vs. SMDRF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SIREF is a Hold and SMDRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (SIREF: $0.04 vs. SMDRF: $0.33)
Brand notoriety: SIREF and SMDRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SIREF: 44% vs. SMDRF: 63%
Market capitalization -- SIREF: $8.93M vs. SMDRF: $36.38M
SIREF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.93M. SMDRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $36.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SIREF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMDRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SIREF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMDRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMDRF is a better buy in the long-term than SIREF.

Price Growth

SIREF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMDRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMDRF($36.4M) has a higher market cap than SIREF($8.93M). SMDRF YTD gains are higher at: 14.655 vs. SIREF (-2.778). SIREF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -805.44K vs. SMDRF (-8.89M). SMDRF has more cash in the bank: 3.19M vs. SIREF (559K). SIREF (0) and SMDRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SIREFSMDRFSIREF / SMDRF
Capitalization8.93M36.4M25%
EBITDA-805.44K-8.89M9%
Gain YTD-2.77814.655-19%
P/E Ratio50.51N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash559K3.19M18%
Total Debt40KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SIREF: Fundamental Ratings
SIREF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
77
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

SIREF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIREF and ARRKF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIREF and ARRKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIREF
1D Price
Change %
SIREF100%
N/A
ARRKF - SIREF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMDRF - SIREF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
NMEX - SIREF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLRRF - SIREF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SITKF - SIREF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
More

SMDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMDRF and CRTIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMDRF and CRTIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMDRF
1D Price
Change %
SMDRF100%
+1.11%
CRTIF - SMDRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIREF - SMDRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMBF - SMDRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
SITKF - SMDRF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
GSHRF - SMDRF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
More