SIREF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
19.5M
SITKF
Price
$0.77
Change
+$0.03 (+4.05%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
299.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SIREF vs SITKF

Header iconSIREF vs SITKF Comparison
Open Charts SIREF vs SITKFBanner chart's image
Sirios Resources
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$250
Capitalization19.5M
Sitka Gold
Price$0.77
Change+$0.03 (+4.05%)
Volume$162.02K
Capitalization299.56M
SIREF vs SITKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SIREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SITKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SIREF vs. SITKF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SIREF is a Hold and SITKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (SIREF: $0.05 vs. SITKF: $0.77)
Brand notoriety: SIREF and SITKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SIREF: 0% vs. SITKF: 80%
Market capitalization -- SIREF: $19.5M vs. SITKF: $299.56M
SIREF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $19.5M. SITKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $299.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SIREF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSITKF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SIREF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SITKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SITKF is a better buy in the long-term than SIREF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SIREF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SITKF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SIREF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SITKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SITKF is a better buy in the short-term than SIREF.

Price Growth

SIREF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.44% price change this week, while SITKF (@Precious Metals) price change was +11.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6065.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SITKF($300M) has a higher market cap than SIREF($19.5M). SITKF YTD gains are higher at: 205.920 vs. SIREF (35.143). SIREF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -679.82K vs. SITKF (-3.82M). SITKF has more cash in the bank: 22.3M vs. SIREF (1.11M). SIREF (0) and SITKF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SIREFSITKFSIREF / SITKF
Capitalization19.5M300M7%
EBITDA-679.82K-3.82M18%
Gain YTD35.143205.92017%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.11M22.3M5%
Total Debt84.1KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SIREF vs SITKF: Fundamental Ratings
SIREF
SITKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1182
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
9295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SITKF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as SIREF (88). This means that SITKF’s stock grew similarly to SIREF’s over the last 12 months.

SITKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SIREF (100). This means that SITKF’s stock grew significantly faster than SIREF’s over the last 12 months.

SIREF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as SITKF (95). This means that SIREF’s stock grew similarly to SITKF’s over the last 12 months.

SITKF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SIREF (48). This means that SITKF’s stock grew similarly to SIREF’s over the last 12 months.

SIREF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SITKF (100). This means that SIREF’s stock grew significantly faster than SITKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SIREFSITKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SIREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SITKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCOTX19.41N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Core Equity C
PLIEX33.13N/A
N/A
Plumb Equity Institutional
JEEDX17.03-0.09
-0.53%
JHancock Infrastructure R6
LGLCX47.46-0.36
-0.75%
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
VNVAX25.04-0.23
-0.91%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap A

SIREF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIREF and SITKF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIREF and SITKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIREF
1D Price
Change %
SIREF100%
-0.21%
SITKF - SIREF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
SROYF - SIREF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRCRF - SIREF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+4.66%

SITKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SITKF and BYAGF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SITKF and BYAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SITKF
1D Price
Change %
SITKF100%
+4.76%
BYAGF - SITKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
SLVMF - SITKF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMDRF - SITKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSRPF - SITKF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
MFGCF - SITKF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.63%
More