SILC
Price
$16.20
Change
+$0.04 (+0.25%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
91.92M
56 days until earnings call
ZBRA
Price
$305.71
Change
-$1.36 (-0.44%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.54B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SILC vs ZBRA

Header iconSILC vs ZBRA Comparison
Open Charts SILC vs ZBRABanner chart's image
Silicom
Price$16.20
Change+$0.04 (+0.25%)
Volume$4.19K
Capitalization91.92M
Zebra Technologies
Price$305.71
Change-$1.36 (-0.44%)
Volume$350.3K
Capitalization15.54B
SILC vs ZBRA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SILC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZBRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SILC vs. ZBRA commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SILC is a Hold and ZBRA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (SILC: $16.20 vs. ZBRA: $305.71)
Brand notoriety: SILC and ZBRA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SILC: 25% vs. ZBRA: 65%
Market capitalization -- SILC: $91.92M vs. ZBRA: $15.54B
SILC [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $91.92M. ZBRA’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $15.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $267.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $7.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SILC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZBRA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SILC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZBRA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZBRA is a better buy in the long-term than SILC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SILC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZBRA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SILC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZBRA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SILC is a better buy in the short-term than ZBRA.

Price Growth

SILC (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -0.31% price change this week, while ZBRA (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -4.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

SILC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

ZBRA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-1.09% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZBRA($15.5B) has a higher market cap than SILC($91.9M). SILC YTD gains are higher at: -0.674 vs. ZBRA (-20.846). ZBRA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 969M vs. SILC (-13.06M). ZBRA has more cash in the bank: 872M vs. SILC (64.3M). SILC has less debt than ZBRA: SILC (6.64M) vs ZBRA (2.36B). ZBRA has higher revenues than SILC: ZBRA (5.19B) vs SILC (58.7M).
SILCZBRASILC / ZBRA
Capitalization91.9M15.5B1%
EBITDA-13.06M969M-1%
Gain YTD-0.674-20.8463%
P/E RatioN/A28.87-
Revenue58.7M5.19B1%
Total Cash64.3M872M7%
Total Debt6.64M2.36B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SILC vs ZBRA: Fundamental Ratings
SILC
ZBRA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
564
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10095
SMR RATING
1..100
9553
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9797
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5048

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SILC's Valuation (69) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as ZBRA (69) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to ZBRA’s over the last 12 months.

ZBRA's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as SILC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that ZBRA’s stock grew similarly to SILC’s over the last 12 months.

ZBRA's SMR Rating (53) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SILC (95) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that ZBRA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SILC’s over the last 12 months.

SILC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as ZBRA (60) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to ZBRA’s over the last 12 months.

SILC's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as ZBRA (97) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to ZBRA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SILCZBRA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SILC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZBRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AKKVF1.20N/A
N/A
AKASTOR ASA ASA
BKQNY10.10N/A
N/A
Bank of Queensland Ltd.
OCPNF11.85N/A
N/A
Olympus Corp.
OIGLF0.01N/A
N/A
Chariot Ltd.
DCHRF0.04N/A
N/A
DISCOVERY HARBOUR RES CORP.

SILC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SILC and SYTA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SILC and SYTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SILC
1D Price
Change %
SILC100%
+0.28%
SYTA - SILC
30%
Poorly correlated
-8.36%
BOXL - SILC
26%
Poorly correlated
-7.99%
ZBRA - SILC
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
EXTR - SILC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
BDC - SILC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
More

ZBRA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZBRA has been closely correlated with BDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZBRA jumps, then BDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZBRA
1D Price
Change %
ZBRA100%
-0.44%
BDC - ZBRA
68%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
LITE - ZBRA
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
EXTR - ZBRA
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
CSCO - ZBRA
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
HPE - ZBRA
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
More