Advertisement
SIGIP vs STC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SIGIP is a Hold and STC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SIGIP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SIGIP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- STC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SIGIP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STC’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SIGIP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- STC’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
SIGIP (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.57% price change this week, while STC (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +11.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
STC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.24% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| SIGIP | STC | SIGIP / STC | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 1.77B | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.039 | -2.068 | -50% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 57.68 | - |
| Revenue | 4.23B | 2.26B | 188% |
| Total Cash | 821M | 272M | 302% |
| Total Debt | 504M | 581M | 87% |
STC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SIGIP | STC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 37% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 34% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 32% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 7 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 21% | 3 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
SIGIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SIGIP and BNT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIGIP and BNT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIGIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIGIP | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| BNT - SIGIP | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
| MCY - SIGIP | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
| STC - SIGIP | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
| CINF - SIGIP | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
| DGICB - SIGIP | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
STC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STC has been loosely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STC jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STC | 100% | -0.72% | ||
| SAFT - STC | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| L - STC | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| HMN - STC | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| KMPR - STC | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| MKL - STC | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
More | ||||