It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SIETY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSSJY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SIETY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USSJY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
SIETY (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +3.39% price change this week, while USSJY (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +12.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.24%.
The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
SIETY | USSJY | SIETY / USSJY | |
Capitalization | 11.2B | 5.58B | 201% |
EBITDA | N/A | 56.3B | - |
Gain YTD | -3.120 | 51.652 | -6% |
P/E Ratio | 25.75 | 23.67 | 109% |
Revenue | N/A | 100B | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 116B | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 2.39B | - |
SIETY | USSJY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SIETY's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USSJY (75). This means that SIETY’s stock grew somewhat faster than USSJY’s over the last 12 months.
SIETY's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as USSJY (11). This means that SIETY’s stock grew similarly to USSJY’s over the last 12 months.
USSJY's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SIETY (56). This means that USSJY’s stock grew similarly to SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
USSJY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SIETY (48). This means that USSJY’s stock grew similarly to SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
USSJY's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as SIETY (28). This means that USSJY’s stock grew similarly to SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
SIETY | USSJY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago19% | 4 days ago29% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago34% | 4 days ago33% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago24% | 4 days ago45% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago51% | 4 days ago36% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago45% | 4 days ago23% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago25% | 4 days ago21% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago15% | 4 days ago29% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SIETY and SIEVF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIETY and SIEVF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIETY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SIETY | 100% | N/A | ||
SIEVF - SIETY | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PAHGF - SIETY | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WFAFY - SIETY | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
USSJY - SIETY | 5% Poorly correlated | +12.64% | ||
TLF - SIETY | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that USSJY and PAHGF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USSJY and PAHGF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USSJY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
USSJY | 100% | +12.64% | ||
PAHGF - USSJY | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WFAFY - USSJY | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
SIETY - USSJY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WCRS - USSJY | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SIEVF - USSJY | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |