SIETY vs TLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SIETY is a Hold and TLF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SIETY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SIETY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
SIETY (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +1.30% price change this week, while TLF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +5.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -3.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
TLF is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-3.85% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| SIETY | TLF | SIETY / TLF | |
| Capitalization | 9.29B | 39.1M | 23,762% |
| EBITDA | 520M | 9.04M | 5,755% |
| Gain YTD | 23.883 | 11.421 | 209% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.47 | 10.33 | 266% |
| Revenue | 4.72B | 76.2M | 6,188% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 12.2M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 9.43M | - |
SIETY | TLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 2 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SIETY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLF (56). This means that SIETY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLF’s over the last 12 months.
SIETY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TLF (94). This means that SIETY’s stock grew significantly faster than TLF’s over the last 12 months.
SIETY's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as TLF (85). This means that SIETY’s stock grew similarly to TLF’s over the last 12 months.
TLF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SIETY (42). This means that TLF’s stock grew similarly to SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
TLF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SIETY (69). This means that TLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
SIETY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SIETY and SIEVF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIETY and SIEVF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIETY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIETY | 100% | N/A | ||
| SIEVF - SIETY | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PAHGF - SIETY | 14% Poorly correlated | +2.98% | ||
| WFAFY - SIETY | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
| USSJY - SIETY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TLF - SIETY | 0% Poorly correlated | -3.02% | ||
More | ||||
TLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TLF and MNSO have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLF and MNSO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLF | 100% | -3.02% | ||
| MNSO - TLF | 10% Poorly correlated | -11.98% | ||
| SNROF - TLF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACVA - TLF | 6% Poorly correlated | -5.41% | ||
| ASO - TLF | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
| CHPT - TLF | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.78% | ||
More | ||||