Advertisement
SIETY vs SNROF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SIETY is a Buy and SNROF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SIETY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNROF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SIETY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SNROF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SIETY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNROF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SIETY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SNROF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SIETY (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -7.77% price change this week, while SNROF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +0.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.53%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+2.94% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| SIETY | SNROF | SIETY / SNROF | |
| Capitalization | 9.29B | 3.79B | 245% |
| EBITDA | 520M | 15.3B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | -5.309 | 24.040 | -22% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.47 | 58.48 | 47% |
| Revenue | 4.72B | 72.6B | 6% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 52B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 23.5B | - |
SIETY | SNROF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SIETY's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNROF (88). This means that SIETY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNROF’s over the last 12 months.
SIETY's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNROF (47). This means that SIETY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNROF’s over the last 12 months.
SNROF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SIETY (79). This means that SNROF’s stock grew significantly faster than SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
SNROF's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SIETY (79). This means that SNROF’s stock grew similarly to SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
SIETY's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SNROF (60). This means that SIETY’s stock grew similarly to SNROF’s over the last 12 months.
| SIETY | SNROF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% | 2 days ago 31% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 30% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 53% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 33% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 20% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FSYD | 48.13 | 0.26 | +0.53% |
| Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF | |||
| XTR | 28.78 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| Global X S&P 500® Tail Risk ETF | |||
| BMAR | 49.59 | 0.05 | +0.11% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Mar | |||
| TMSL | 33.29 | -0.11 | -0.33% |
| T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF | |||
| IWM | 221.43 | -0.90 | -0.40% |
| iShares Russell 2000 ETF | |||
SIETY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SIETY and SIEVF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIETY and SIEVF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIETY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIETY | 100% | N/A | ||
| SIEVF - SIETY | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PAHGF - SIETY | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WFAFY - SIETY | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| USSJY - SIETY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TLF - SIETY | 0% Poorly correlated | +1.97% | ||
More | ||||
SNROF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNROF has been loosely correlated with USSJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNROF jumps, then USSJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNROF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNROF | 100% | N/A | ||
| USSJF - SNROF | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PAHGF - SNROF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WFAFF - SNROF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SIETY - SNROF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SIEVF - SNROF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||