Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SICNX vs VFWPX
SICNX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts SICNX vs VFWPX
Schwab® International Core Equity
Price$16.23
Change+$1.10 (+7.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets961.94M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$163.39
Change+$13.31 (+8.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.2B
SICNX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SICNX vs. VFWPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SICNX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. SICNX (962M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than SICNX: VFWPX (2.93) vs SICNX (2.38). SICNX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: SICNX (18 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). SICNX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). SICNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. VFWPX (6.00). SICNX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: SICNX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). SICNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.44 vs. VFWPX (34.29). SICNX return over 5 years is better than : 69.91 vs. VFWPX (34.77).
| SICNX | VFWPX | SICNX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.03 | 2,867% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,900% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.706 | 6.471 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 962M | 78.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 2.93 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.44 | 34.29 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.53 | 47.98 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.91 | 34.77 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.90 | 110.45 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement