SHTLF
Price
$1.75
Change
+$0.01 (+0.57%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
7.74B
SMDZF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
16.46M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHTLF vs SMDZF

Header iconSHTLF vs SMDZF Comparison
Open Charts SHTLF vs SMDZFBanner chart's image
South32
Price$1.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.57%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization7.74B
Strategic Metals Ltd. New
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.31K
Capitalization16.46M
SHTLF vs SMDZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHTLF vs. SMDZF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHTLF is a Hold and SMDZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SHTLF: $1.75 vs. SMDZF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: SHTLF and SMDZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHTLF: 26% vs. SMDZF: 5%
Market capitalization -- SHTLF: $7.74B vs. SMDZF: $16.46M
SHTLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.74B. SMDZF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $16.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHTLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMDZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SHTLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMDZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMDZF is a better buy in the long-term than SHTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHTLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMDZF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHTLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMDZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMDZF is a better buy in the short-term than SHTLF.

Price Growth

SHTLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.89% price change this week, while SMDZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHTLF($7.74B) has a higher market cap than SMDZF($16.5M). SMDZF YTD gains are higher at: 46.871 vs. SHTLF (-18.040). SHTLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 689M vs. SMDZF (-1.72M). SHTLF has more cash in the bank: 1.61B vs. SMDZF (6.25M). SHTLF has higher revenues than SMDZF: SHTLF (6.1B) vs SMDZF (0).
SHTLFSMDZFSHTLF / SMDZF
Capitalization7.74B16.5M46,891%
EBITDA689M-1.72M-40,029%
Gain YTD-18.04046.871-38%
P/E Ratio25.00N/A-
Revenue6.1B0-
Total Cash1.61B6.25M25,797%
Total Debt1.65BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHTLF vs SMDZF: Fundamental Ratings
SHTLF
SMDZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77100
SMR RATING
1..100
8993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMDZF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHTLF (94). This means that SMDZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHTLF’s over the last 12 months.

SHTLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as SMDZF (100). This means that SHTLF’s stock grew similarly to SMDZF’s over the last 12 months.

SHTLF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as SMDZF (93). This means that SHTLF’s stock grew similarly to SMDZF’s over the last 12 months.

SMDZF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHTLF (83). This means that SMDZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHTLF’s over the last 12 months.

SHTLF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMDZF (100). This means that SHTLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMDZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHTLFSMDZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BZLFF34.10N/A
N/A
Bunzl plc
RNDOF9.39N/A
N/A
Round One Corp.
EAGRF0.30N/A
N/A
EAST SIDE GAMES GROUP INC.
INVUP26.50N/A
N/A
Investview Inc.
VMTHF0.52N/A
N/A
VENUS MEDTECH HANGZHOU INC.

SHTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHTLF and SOUHY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHTLF and SOUHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHTLF
1D Price
Change %
SHTLF100%
N/A
SOUHY - SHTLF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
KMRPF - SHTLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TKRFF - SHTLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
SIERF - SHTLF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTNTF - SHTLF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMDZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMDZF and SYAAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMDZF and SYAAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMDZF
1D Price
Change %
SMDZF100%
+0.75%
SYAAF - SMDZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
OMZNF - SMDZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.97%
MJDLF - SMDZF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.59%
SHTLF - SMDZF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLGGF - SMDZF
3%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
More