Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SHOC vs XLK
SHOC vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs XLK
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
Price$74.95
Change+$9.20 (+13.99%)
Volume$25.07K
Net Assets156.2M
State Street®TechSelSectSPDR®ETF
Price$142.08
Change-$148.12 (-51.04%)
Volume$30.46M
Net Assets92.54B
SHOC vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. XLK commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Buy and XLK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 92.5B vs. SHOC (156M). SHOC has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: SHOC (12.015) vs XLK (0.896). SHOC was incepted earlier than XLK: SHOC (3 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SHOC has a higher turnover XLK (5.00) vs XLK (5.00).
| SHOC | XLK | SHOC / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 12.015 | 0.896 | 1,341% |
| Net Assets | 156M | 92.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.08 | 500% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 5.00 | 500% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 0.54 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| NVDA - SHOC | 85% Closely correlated | -2.89% | ||
| MKSI - SHOC | 84% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| AMAT - SHOC | 81% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| NVDA - XLK | 84% Closely correlated | -2.89% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| TRMB - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| AVGO - XLK | 78% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||