Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SHOC vs SMH
SHOC vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs SMH
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
Price$46.02
Change-$0.69 (-1.48%)
Volume$272
Net Assets81.92M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$241.43
Change-$4.11 (-1.67%)
Volume$66.65K
Net Assets22.12B
SHOC vs SMH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. SMH commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Buy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 22.1B vs. SHOC (81.9M). SHOC has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: SHOC (1.796) vs SMH (1.392). SHOC was incepted earlier than SMH: SHOC (3 years) vs SMH (13 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SHOC has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| SHOC | SMH | SHOC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 1.796 | 1.392 | 129% |
| Net Assets | 81.9M | 22.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 18.00 | 161% |
| Yield | 0.32 | 0.51 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with MPWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then MPWR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| MPWR - SHOC | 82% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 81% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| AVGO - SHOC | 78% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| ASML - SHOC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| AVGO - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||