Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SHOC vs SMH
SHOC vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs SMH
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
Price$69.58
Change+$0.51 (+0.74%)
Volume$100
Net Assets137.56M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$364.44
Change+$5.01 (+1.39%)
Volume$55.19K
Net Assets35.52B
SHOC vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. SMH commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 35.5B vs. SHOC (138M). SHOC (50.824) and SMH (48.491) have matching annual dividend yield . SHOC was incepted earlier than SMH: SHOC (3 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SHOC has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SHOC | SMH | SHOC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 50.824 | 48.491 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 138M | 35.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 15.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 0.30 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 77% | 16 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | +1.73% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| NVDA - SHOC | 85% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| MKSI - SHOC | 84% Closely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| AMAT - SHOC | 81% Closely correlated | +4.20% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.88% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +4.20% | ||
More | ||||