Ad is loading...
SHOC vs SMH
SHOC vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs SMH
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
Price$47.27
Change-$1.60 (-3.27%)
Volume$29.47K
Net Assets81.28M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$249.99
Change-$7.81 (-3.03%)
Volume$7.58M
Net Assets23.33B
SHOC vs SMH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. SMH commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Buy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 23.3B vs. SHOC (81.3M). SMH (5.802) and SHOC (5.729) have matching annual dividend yield . SHOC was incepted earlier than SMH: SHOC (2 years) vs SMH (13 years). SMH has a higher turnover SHOC (10.00) vs SHOC (10.00).
| SHOC | SMH | SHOC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 5.729 | 5.802 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 81.3M | 23.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 10.00 | 18.00 | 56% |
| Yield | 0.56 | 0.46 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 78% | 21 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | +1.13% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 81% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 79% Closely correlated | +4.63% | ||
| AVGO - SHOC | 78% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| ASML - SHOC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| AMAT - SHOC | 77% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.44% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +4.63% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| AVGO - SMH | 78% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
More | ||||