Ad is loading...
SHOC vs SMH
SHOC vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs SMH
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
Price$36.44
Change-$0.36 (-0.98%)
Volume$9.51K
Net Assets63.81M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$192.53
Change-$1.82 (-0.94%)
Volume$7.07M
Net Assets19.16B
SHOC vs SMH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. SMH commentary
Apr 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Hold and SMH is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 19.2B vs. SHOC (63.8M). SMH (-20.498) and SHOC (-20.573) have matching annual dividend yield . SHOC was incepted earlier than SMH: SHOC (3 years) vs SMH (13 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SHOC has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| SHOC | SMH | SHOC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | -20.573 | -20.498 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 63.8M | 19.2B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 18.00 | 161% |
| Yield | 0.33 | 0.51 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | -0.99% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 81% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| MPWR - SHOC | 80% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 79% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| AVGO - SHOC | 78% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| ASML - SHOC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| MPWR - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||