Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SHOC vs SMH
SHOC vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs SMH
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
Price$56.85
Change-$1.35 (-2.32%)
Volume$17.91K
Net Assets107.53M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$295.65
Change-$6.27 (-2.08%)
Volume$9.03M
Net Assets27.07B
SHOC vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. SMH commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Buy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 27.1B vs. SHOC (108M). SHOC has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: SHOC (24.064) vs SMH (22.084). SHOC was incepted earlier than SMH: SHOC (3 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SHOC has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SHOC | SMH | SHOC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 24.064 | 22.084 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 108M | 27.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 15.00 | 193% |
| Yield | 0.31 | 0.37 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 80% | 12 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | -2.32% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 89% Closely correlated | -7.33% | ||
| NVDA - SHOC | 87% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 87% Closely correlated | -8.42% | ||
| AMAT - SHOC | 87% Closely correlated | -14.07% | ||
| MKSI - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | -4.31% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -2.08% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | -7.33% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | -8.42% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | -14.07% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||