SHNWF
Price
$5.52
Change
+$0.02 (+0.36%)
Updated
Dec 30 closing price
Capitalization
8.6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STT
Price
$136.87
Change
+$2.15 (+1.60%)
Updated
Jan 15, 12:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
37.63B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHNWF vs STT

Header iconSHNWF vs STT Comparison
Open Charts SHNWF vs STTBanner chart's image
Schroders
Price$5.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.36%)
Volume$836
Capitalization8.6B
State Street
Price$136.87
Change+$2.15 (+1.60%)
Volume$815
Capitalization37.63B
SHNWF vs STT Comparison Chart in %
SHNWF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHNWF vs. STT commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHNWF is a Hold and STT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (SHNWF: $5.52 vs. STT: $134.72)
Brand notoriety: SHNWF and STT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHNWF: 75% vs. STT: 134%
Market capitalization -- SHNWF: $8.6B vs. STT: $37.63B
SHNWF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $8.6B. STT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $37.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $169.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHNWF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTT’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • SHNWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, STT is a better buy in the long-term than SHNWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHNWF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHNWF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHNWF is a better buy in the short-term than STT.

Price Growth

SHNWF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STT (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

STT is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.24% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STT($37.6B) has a higher market cap than SHNWF($8.6B). SHNWF has higher P/E ratio than STT: SHNWF (18.44) vs STT (14.30). STT YTD gains are higher at: 5.110 vs. SHNWF (0.000). SHNWF has more cash in the bank: 7.06B vs. STT (4.76B). SHNWF has less debt than STT: SHNWF (588M) vs STT (34.5B). STT has higher revenues than SHNWF: STT (13.7B) vs SHNWF (3.02B).
SHNWFSTTSHNWF / STT
Capitalization8.6B37.6B23%
EBITDA655MN/A-
Gain YTD0.0005.110-
P/E Ratio18.4414.30129%
Revenue3.02B13.7B22%
Total Cash7.06B4.76B148%
Total Debt588M34.5B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STT: Fundamental Ratings
STT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23
SMR RATING
1..100
9
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHNWFSTT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHNWF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LLDR46.030.43
+0.95%
Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF
TYD25.600.16
+0.64%
Direxion Daily 7-10 Yr Trs Bull 3X ETF
DDWM45.010.22
+0.50%
WisdomTree Dynamic International Eq ETF
TSI4.920.01
+0.20%
TCW Strategic Income Fund
ALAI36.56-0.76
-2.04%
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF

SHNWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHNWF and STT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHNWF and STT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHNWF
1D Price
Change %
SHNWF100%
N/A
STT - SHNWF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
FNCSF - SHNWF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.07%
BAM - SHNWF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
BBUC - SHNWF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
GAMI - SHNWF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
More

STT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STT
1D Price
Change %
STT100%
+1.44%
NTRS - STT
82%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
BLK - STT
81%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
BN - STT
79%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
AMP - STT
78%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
AMG - STT
77%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
More