SHMDF
Price
$139.38
Change
-$6.62 (-4.53%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.84B
VIVC
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
25.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHMDF vs VIVC

Header iconSHMDF vs VIVC Comparison
Open Charts SHMDF vs VIVCBanner chart's image
Shimano
Price$139.38
Change-$6.62 (-4.53%)
Volume$1
Capitalization13.84B
Vivic
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$464
Capitalization25.29M
SHMDF vs VIVC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHMDF vs. VIVC commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHMDF is a Hold and VIVC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (SHMDF: $139.38 vs. VIVC: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: SHMDF and VIVC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHMDF: 0% vs. VIVC: 5%
Market capitalization -- SHMDF: $13.84B vs. VIVC: $25.29M
SHMDF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $13.84B. VIVC’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $25.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHMDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVIVC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SHMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VIVC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHMDF is a better buy in the long-term than VIVC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHMDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIVC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHMDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VIVC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VIVC is a better buy in the short-term than SHMDF.

Price Growth

SHMDF (@Recreational Products) experienced а -4.49% price change this week, while VIVC (@Recreational Products) price change was -17.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+1.26% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHMDF($13.8B) has a higher market cap than VIVC($25.3M). SHMDF YTD gains are higher at: 3.590 vs. VIVC (-98.149). SHMDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 164B vs. VIVC (-944.24K). SHMDF has more cash in the bank: 419B vs. VIVC (335K). VIVC has less debt than SHMDF: VIVC (657K) vs SHMDF (2.37B). SHMDF has higher revenues than VIVC: SHMDF (611B) vs VIVC (150K).
SHMDFVIVCSHMDF / VIVC
Capitalization13.8B25.3M54,545%
EBITDA164B-944.24K-17,368,502%
Gain YTD3.590-98.149-4%
P/E Ratio16.08N/A-
Revenue611B150K407,333,333%
Total Cash419B335K125,074,627%
Total Debt2.37B657K360,731%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHMDF vs VIVC: Fundamental Ratings
SHMDF
VIVC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
50100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6297
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VIVC's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as SHMDF (79). This means that VIVC’s stock grew similarly to SHMDF’s over the last 12 months.

VIVC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SHMDF (100). This means that VIVC’s stock grew similarly to SHMDF’s over the last 12 months.

SHMDF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VIVC (100). This means that SHMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VIVC’s over the last 12 months.

SHMDF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VIVC (97). This means that SHMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VIVC’s over the last 12 months.

SHMDF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as VIVC (100). This means that SHMDF’s stock grew similarly to VIVC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHMDFVIVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ONTO99.441.19
+1.21%
Onto Innovation
BKHAU10.51N/A
N/A
Black Hawk Acquisition Corp
GCMG12.19-0.01
-0.08%
GCM Grosvenor
SDGR22.23-0.26
-1.16%
Schrodinger
WKHS1.94-0.14
-6.73%
Workhorse Group Inc

SHMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHMDF and SMNNY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHMDF and SMNNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHMDF
1D Price
Change %
SHMDF100%
N/A
SMNNY - SHMDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
PMTYF - SHMDF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNMSF - SHMDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THUPY - SHMDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
THLPF - SHMDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VIVC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VIVC and PYHOF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VIVC and PYHOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIVC
1D Price
Change %
VIVC100%
-10.00%
PYHOF - VIVC
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMTYF - VIVC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHMDF - VIVC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNMSF - VIVC
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YAMCF - VIVC
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More