SHMDF
Price
$139.38
Change
-$6.62 (-4.53%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.84B
THLPF
Price
$32.73
Change
+$4.12 (+14.40%)
Updated
Mar 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHMDF vs THLPF

Header iconSHMDF vs THLPF Comparison
Open Charts SHMDF vs THLPFBanner chart's image
Shimano
Price$139.38
Change-$6.62 (-4.53%)
Volume$1
Capitalization13.84B
Thule Group AB
Price$32.73
Change+$4.12 (+14.40%)
Volume$521
Capitalization3.3B
SHMDF vs THLPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHMDF vs. THLPF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHMDF is a Hold and THLPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (SHMDF: $139.38 vs. THLPF: $32.73)
Brand notoriety: SHMDF and THLPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHMDF: 0% vs. THLPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SHMDF: $13.84B vs. THLPF: $3.3B
SHMDF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $13.84B. THLPF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $3.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHMDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTHLPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SHMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • THLPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, THLPF is a better buy in the long-term than SHMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHMDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SHMDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

SHMDF (@Recreational Products) experienced а -4.49% price change this week, while THLPF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+1.26% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHMDF($13.8B) has a higher market cap than THLPF($3.3B). THLPF has higher P/E ratio than SHMDF: THLPF (33.67) vs SHMDF (16.08). SHMDF YTD gains are higher at: 3.590 vs. THLPF (2.272). SHMDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 164B vs. THLPF (1.32B). SHMDF has more cash in the bank: 419B vs. THLPF (233M). SHMDF has less debt than THLPF: SHMDF (2.37B) vs THLPF (2.85B). SHMDF has higher revenues than THLPF: SHMDF (611B) vs THLPF (9.05B).
SHMDFTHLPFSHMDF / THLPF
Capitalization13.8B3.3B419%
EBITDA164B1.32B12,443%
Gain YTD3.5902.272158%
P/E Ratio16.0833.6748%
Revenue611B9.05B6,755%
Total Cash419B233M179,828%
Total Debt2.37B2.85B83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHMDF vs THLPF: Fundamental Ratings
SHMDF
THLPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10074
SMR RATING
1..100
5055
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6253
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7836
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a31

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

THLPF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHMDF (79). This means that THLPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHMDF’s over the last 12 months.

THLPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as SHMDF (100). This means that THLPF’s stock grew similarly to SHMDF’s over the last 12 months.

SHMDF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as THLPF (55). This means that SHMDF’s stock grew similarly to THLPF’s over the last 12 months.

THLPF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SHMDF (62). This means that THLPF’s stock grew similarly to SHMDF’s over the last 12 months.

THLPF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHMDF (78). This means that THLPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHMDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHMDFTHLPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JACLX18.890.16
+0.85%
JHancock Mid Cap Growth C
CRIAX10.980.08
+0.73%
CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Inst
SUWIX36.810.12
+0.33%
DWS Core Equity Inst
FFAFX84.200.28
+0.33%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
LIRRX9.63-0.01
-0.10%
Lord Abbett International Value R3

SHMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHMDF and SMNNY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHMDF and SMNNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHMDF
1D Price
Change %
SHMDF100%
N/A
SMNNY - SHMDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
PMTYF - SHMDF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNMSF - SHMDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THUPY - SHMDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
THLPF - SHMDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

THLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that THLPF and GBBYF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that THLPF and GBBYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THLPF
1D Price
Change %
THLPF100%
N/A
GBBYF - THLPF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHMDF - THLPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMNNY - THLPF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
YAMCF - THLPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PYHOF - THLPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More