SHLLF
Price
$1.29
Change
-$0.01 (-0.77%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
345.91M
YZCFF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.4B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHLLF vs YZCFF

Header iconSHLLF vs YZCFF Comparison
Open Charts SHLLF vs YZCFFBanner chart's image
Shelf Drilling
Price$1.29
Change-$0.01 (-0.77%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization345.91M
Sinopec Yizheng Chem Fibre
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$200
Capitalization4.4B
SHLLF vs YZCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHLLF vs. YZCFF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHLLF is a Hold and YZCFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SHLLF: $1.29 vs. YZCFF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: SHLLF and YZCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Contract Drilling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHLLF: 2% vs. YZCFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SHLLF: $345.91M vs. YZCFF: $4.4B
SHLLF [@Contract Drilling] is valued at $345.91M. YZCFF’s [@Contract Drilling] market capitalization is $4.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Contract Drilling] industry ranges from $4.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Contract Drilling] industry is $1.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHLLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYZCFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SHLLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YZCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHLLF is a better buy in the long-term than YZCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHLLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SHLLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

SHLLF (@Contract Drilling) experienced а -0.46% price change this week, while YZCFF (@Contract Drilling) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Contract Drilling (-0.73% weekly)

The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YZCFF($4.4B) has a higher market cap than SHLLF($346M). YZCFF has higher P/E ratio than SHLLF: YZCFF (10.90) vs SHLLF (2.59). SHLLF YTD gains are higher at: 64.589 vs. YZCFF (0.000). YZCFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.89B vs. SHLLF (335M). YZCFF has more cash in the bank: 4.87B vs. SHLLF (207M). SHLLF has less debt than YZCFF: SHLLF (1.36B) vs YZCFF (23.9B). YZCFF has higher revenues than SHLLF: YZCFF (80.4B) vs SHLLF (976M).
SHLLFYZCFFSHLLF / YZCFF
Capitalization346M4.4B8%
EBITDA335M1.89B18%
Gain YTD64.5890.000-
P/E Ratio2.5910.9024%
Revenue976M80.4B1%
Total Cash207M4.87B4%
Total Debt1.36B23.9B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
YZCFF: Fundamental Ratings
YZCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHLLFYZCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIFAX12.38N/A
N/A
MFS Diversified Income A
THIGX35.28-0.07
-0.20%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth I
CDIVX12.70-0.03
-0.24%
Copeland Dividend Growth Fund Class I
MFRBX52.82-0.15
-0.28%
MFS Research B
DCUSX14.57-0.07
-0.48%
DWS CROCI US S

SHLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHLLF and AKTAF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHLLF and AKTAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHLLF
1D Price
Change %
SHLLF100%
N/A
AKTAF - SHLLF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
WEEEF - SHLLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NE - SHLLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
YZCFF - SHLLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTNOF - SHLLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

YZCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YZCFF and WEEEF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YZCFF and WEEEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YZCFF
1D Price
Change %
YZCFF100%
N/A
WEEEF - YZCFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AKTAF - YZCFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
NE - YZCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
ESVIF - YZCFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
SOC - YZCFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.49%
More