Advertisement
SHGXY vs SOSCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHGXY is a Hold and SOSCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SHGXY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSOSCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SHGXY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SOSCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
SHGXY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOSCF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.66%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (+0.95% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| SHGXY | SOSCF | SHGXY / SOSCF | |
| Capitalization | 110M | 111M | 99% |
| EBITDA | 136M | -21.16M | -643% |
| Gain YTD | -24.256 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 30.16 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.02B | 925M | 110% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 24.5M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 167M | - |
SHGXY | SOSCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 69 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 53 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SHGXY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOSCF (65). This means that SHGXY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOSCF’s over the last 12 months.
SHGXY's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOSCF (90). This means that SHGXY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOSCF’s over the last 12 months.
SHGXY's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as SOSCF (94). This means that SHGXY’s stock grew similarly to SOSCF’s over the last 12 months.
SOSCF's Price Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SHGXY (72). This means that SOSCF’s stock grew similarly to SHGXY’s over the last 12 months.
SOSCF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SHGXY (45). This means that SOSCF’s stock grew similarly to SHGXY’s over the last 12 months.
| SHGXY | SOSCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 11% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 8% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
SHGXY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHGXY has been loosely correlated with MKC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHGXY jumps, then MKC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHGXY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHGXY | 100% | N/A | ||
| MKC - SHGXY | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| RRSFF - SHGXY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NSLYF - SHGXY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SOSCF - SHGXY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SDSYA - SHGXY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SOSCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SOSCF and TYCMY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOSCF and TYCMY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOSCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOSCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TYCMY - SOSCF | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
| SHGXY - SOSCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| YMZBY - SOSCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JWLLF - SOSCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TUFBY - SOSCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||