SHG
Price
$49.92
Change
-$0.02 (-0.04%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
24.3B
72 days until earnings call
WF
Price
$54.77
Change
-$0.31 (-0.56%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
13.53B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHG vs WF

Header iconSHG vs WF Comparison
Open Charts SHG vs WFBanner chart's image
Shinhan Financial Group
Price$49.92
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
Volume$129.88K
Capitalization24.3B
Woori Financial Group
Price$54.77
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
Volume$29.28K
Capitalization13.53B
SHG vs WF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHG vs. WF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHG is a Hold and WF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (SHG: $49.92 vs. WF: $54.77)
Brand notoriety: SHG and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHG: 61% vs. WF: 42%
Market capitalization -- SHG: $24.3B vs. WF: $13.53B
SHG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $24.3B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SHG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SHG and WF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHG is a better buy in the short-term than WF.

Price Growth

SHG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.46% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHG is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

WF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHG($24.3B) has a higher market cap than WF($13.5B). SHG has higher P/E ratio than WF: SHG (7.49) vs WF (6.82). WF YTD gains are higher at: 77.307 vs. SHG (51.825). WF has less debt than SHG: WF (79.95T) vs SHG (130.45T). SHG has higher revenues than WF: SHG (17.65T) vs WF (12.73T).
SHGWFSHG / WF
Capitalization24.3B13.5B180%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD51.82577.30767%
P/E Ratio7.496.82110%
Revenue17.65T12.73T139%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt130.45T79.95T163%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHG vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
SHG
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
104
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2613
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3916
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
46n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (66) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (88) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (26) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (42) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHGWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EUFN34.43-0.02
-0.06%
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
BAFE26.59-0.02
-0.09%
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF
DMBS49.07-0.08
-0.17%
DoubleLine Mortgage ETF
SFYX15.42-0.05
-0.35%
SoFi Next 500 ETF
OBTC33.27-0.33
-0.98%
Osprey Bitcoin Trust

SHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHG has been closely correlated with KB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHG jumps, then KB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHG
1D Price
Change %
SHG100%
-0.04%
KB - SHG
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
WF - SHG
78%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
NWG - SHG
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
COLB - SHG
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
CADE - SHG
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
More

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
-0.56%
SHG - WF
78%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
KB - WF
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
NWG - WF
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
BSAC - WF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
BCH - WF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
More