SHG
Price
$54.63
Change
+$1.43 (+2.69%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.74B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WF
Price
$57.98
Change
+$0.94 (+1.65%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.88B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHG vs WF

Header iconSHG vs WF Comparison
Open Charts SHG vs WFBanner chart's image
Shinhan Financial Group
Price$54.63
Change+$1.43 (+2.69%)
Volume$1.26K
Capitalization25.74B
Woori Financial Group
Price$57.98
Change+$0.94 (+1.65%)
Volume$1.06K
Capitalization13.88B
SHG vs WF Comparison Chart in %
SHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHG vs. WF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHG is a Hold and WF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (SHG: $53.20 vs. WF: $57.04)
Brand notoriety: SHG and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHG: 67% vs. WF: 78%
Market capitalization -- SHG: $25.74B vs. WF: $13.88B
SHG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.74B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $159.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SHG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the long-term than SHG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the short-term than SHG.

Price Growth

SHG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.04% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHG is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

WF is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHG($25.7B) has a higher market cap than WF($13.9B). SHG has higher P/E ratio than WF: SHG (8.07) vs WF (6.68). SHG YTD gains are higher at: -0.802 vs. WF (-2.977). WF has less debt than SHG: WF (83.28T) vs SHG (129.76T). SHG has higher revenues than WF: SHG (16.71T) vs WF (12.92T).
SHGWFSHG / WF
Capitalization25.7B13.9B185%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.802-2.97727%
P/E Ratio8.076.68121%
Revenue16.71T12.92T129%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt129.76T83.28T156%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHG vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
SHG
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7266
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1917
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (53) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (85) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (46) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (19) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHGWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NCIQ24.720.73
+3.04%
Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF
FSTA51.390.51
+1.00%
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
AVMA67.83-0.11
-0.17%
Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF
BINT29.28-0.13
-0.44%
Bluemonte Global Equity ETF
FLKR35.20-0.45
-1.28%
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF

SHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHG has been closely correlated with KB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHG jumps, then KB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHG
1D Price
Change %
SHG100%
-0.73%
KB - SHG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
WF - SHG
78%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
SBNY - SHG
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.67%
MFG - SHG
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
NWG - SHG
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.19%
More

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
+0.58%
SHG - WF
78%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
KB - WF
72%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
SBNY - WF
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.67%
DBSDY - WF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
MFG - WF
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
More