SHFS
Price
$3.27
Change
-$0.04 (-1.21%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
53.09M
WAL
Price
$82.18
Change
-$1.03 (-1.24%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.88B
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHFS vs WAL

Header iconSHFS vs WAL Comparison
Open Charts SHFS vs WALBanner chart's image
SHF Holdings
Price$3.27
Change-$0.04 (-1.21%)
Volume$13.7K
Capitalization53.09M
Western Alliance Ban
Price$82.18
Change-$1.03 (-1.24%)
Volume$1.05M
Capitalization6.88B
SHFS vs WAL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHFS vs. WAL commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHFS is a Hold and WAL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (SHFS: $3.27 vs. WAL: $82.18)
Brand notoriety: SHFS and WAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHFS: 54% vs. WAL: 117%
Market capitalization -- SHFS: $53.09M vs. WAL: $6.88B
SHFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $53.09M. WAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWAL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SHFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WAL is a better buy in the long-term than SHFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHFS is a better buy in the short-term than WAL.

Price Growth

SHFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.89% price change this week, while WAL (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

WAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WAL($6.88B) has a higher market cap than SHFS($53.1M). WAL has higher P/E ratio than SHFS: WAL (9.55) vs SHFS (3.43). WAL YTD gains are higher at: -0.726 vs. SHFS (-63.691). SHFS has less debt than WAL: SHFS (15.5M) vs WAL (8.12B). WAL has higher revenues than SHFS: WAL (2.13B) vs SHFS (-27.72M).
SHFSWALSHFS / WAL
Capitalization53.1M6.88B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-63.691-0.7268,770%
P/E Ratio3.439.5536%
Revenue-27.72M2.13B-1%
Total CashN/A289M-
Total Debt15.5M8.12B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WAL: Fundamental Ratings
WAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
68
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHFSWAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JHJIX24.330.10
+0.41%
JHancock ESG Large Cap Core I
CGFAX82.880.27
+0.33%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
SMVLX78.610.24
+0.31%
Smead Value Investor
GPGOX3.640.01
+0.28%
Grandeur Peak Global Opportunities Inv
TPISX13.39-0.05
-0.37%
Nuveen Quant Intl Small Cap Eq Premier

SHFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHFS and TCBI have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHFS and TCBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHFS
1D Price
Change %
SHFS100%
-1.21%
TCBI - SHFS
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
ABCB - SHFS
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
UMBF - SHFS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
FBP - SHFS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
WAL - SHFS
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
More

WAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAL has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WAL jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAL
1D Price
Change %
WAL100%
-1.24%
FNB - WAL
88%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
BKU - WAL
87%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
ZION - WAL
87%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
ABCB - WAL
87%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
EWBC - WAL
87%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
More