SHFS
Price
$2.28
Change
-$0.02 (-0.87%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
53.09M
UMBF
Price
$110.35
Change
+$0.92 (+0.84%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHFS vs UMBF

Header iconSHFS vs UMBF Comparison
Open Charts SHFS vs UMBFBanner chart's image
SHF Holdings
Price$2.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.87%)
Volume$19.24K
Capitalization53.09M
UMB Financial
Price$110.35
Change+$0.92 (+0.84%)
Volume$301.44K
Capitalization4.12B
SHFS vs UMBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHFS vs. UMBF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHFS is a Hold and UMBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SHFS: $2.28 vs. UMBF: $110.35)
Brand notoriety: SHFS and UMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHFS: 108% vs. UMBF: 51%
Market capitalization -- SHFS: $53.09M vs. UMBF: $4.12B
SHFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $53.09M. UMBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SHFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UMBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMBF is a better buy in the long-term than SHFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UMBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHFS is a better buy in the short-term than UMBF.

Price Growth

SHFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.11% price change this week, while UMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

UMBF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UMBF($4.12B) has a higher market cap than SHFS($53.1M). UMBF has higher P/E ratio than SHFS: UMBF (11.78) vs SHFS (3.43). UMBF YTD gains are higher at: -1.471 vs. SHFS (-74.684). SHFS has less debt than UMBF: SHFS (15.5M) vs UMBF (1.38B). UMBF has higher revenues than SHFS: UMBF (1.33B) vs SHFS (-27.72M).
SHFSUMBFSHFS / UMBF
Capitalization53.1M4.12B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-74.684-1.4715,078%
P/E Ratio3.4311.7829%
Revenue-27.72M1.33B-2%
Total CashN/A447M-
Total Debt15.5M1.38B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UMBF: Fundamental Ratings
UMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
40
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHFSUMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HKTTY16.83N/A
N/A
Hkt Trust and Hkt Ltd
TSDRF0.07N/A
N/A
Tsodilo Resources Limited
YIPCF0.17N/A
N/A
Yip's Chemical Holdings Ltd.
HRCR3894.09N/A
N/A
Hershey Creamery Co.
CHRHF1.75N/A
N/A
CHERVON HLDGS LTD.

SHFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHFS and TCBI have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHFS and TCBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHFS
1D Price
Change %
SHFS100%
-0.74%
TCBI - SHFS
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
ABCB - SHFS
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
UMBF - SHFS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
FBP - SHFS
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
WAL - SHFS
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
More

UMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMBF has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMBF jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMBF
1D Price
Change %
UMBF100%
+0.84%
FNB - UMBF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
PNFP - UMBF
90%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
ABCB - UMBF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
HWC - UMBF
90%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
SNV - UMBF
89%
Closely correlated
N/A
More