It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SHCAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWDHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SHCAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWDHF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
SHCAF (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SWDHF (@Computer Peripherals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.77%.
Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
SHCAF | SWDHF | SHCAF / SWDHF | |
Capitalization | 3.4B | 765M | 445% |
EBITDA | -48.13B | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -14.530 | 6.390 | -227% |
P/E Ratio | 13.24 | 13.12 | 101% |
Revenue | 2.26T | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 249B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 579B | N/A | - |
SHCAF | SWDHF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SHCAF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as SWDHF (17). This means that SHCAF’s stock grew similarly to SWDHF’s over the last 12 months.
SWDHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as SHCAF (100). This means that SWDHF’s stock grew similarly to SHCAF’s over the last 12 months.
SWDHF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as SHCAF (100). This means that SWDHF’s stock grew similarly to SHCAF’s over the last 12 months.
SWDHF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as SHCAF (80). This means that SWDHF’s stock grew similarly to SHCAF’s over the last 12 months.
SWDHF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHCAF (53). This means that SWDHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHCAF’s over the last 12 months.
SHCAF | SWDHF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago28% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago23% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago28% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago25% | 4 days ago25% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago29% | 4 days ago24% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago44% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SHCAF and SHCAY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHCAF and SHCAY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHCAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SHCAF | 100% | N/A | ||
SHCAY - SHCAF | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
TCLHF - SHCAF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SNEJF - SHCAF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
SNCPF - SHCAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SWDHF - SHCAF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SWDHF and XIACY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWDHF and XIACY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SWDHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SWDHF | 100% | N/A | ||
XIACY - SWDHF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
XIACF - SWDHF | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
SHCAY - SWDHF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
SNCPF - SWDHF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SHCAF - SWDHF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |