SHANF
Price
$0.31
Change
+$0.18 (+138.46%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
453.17M
TGSGY
Price
$8.77
Change
-$0.05 (-0.57%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.72B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHANF vs TGSGY

Header iconSHANF vs TGSGY Comparison
Open Charts SHANF vs TGSGYBanner chart's image
Shandong Molomg Petroleum Machinery
Price$0.31
Change+$0.18 (+138.46%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization453.17M
TGS ASA
Price$8.77
Change-$0.05 (-0.57%)
Volume$25.61K
Capitalization1.72B
SHANF vs TGSGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGSGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHANF vs. TGSGY commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHANF is a Hold and TGSGY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (SHANF: $0.31 vs. TGSGY: $8.77)
Brand notoriety: SHANF and TGSGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHANF: 202% vs. TGSGY: 62%
Market capitalization -- SHANF: $453.17M vs. TGSGY: $1.72B
SHANF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $453.17M. TGSGY’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $1.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHANF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGSGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SHANF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TGSGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SHANF and TGSGY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHANF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGSGY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHANF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TGSGY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHANF is a better buy in the short-term than TGSGY.

Price Growth

SHANF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TGSGY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -9.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.95% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGSGY($1.72B) has a higher market cap than SHANF($453M). TGSGY has higher P/E ratio than SHANF: TGSGY (29.76) vs SHANF (14.49). SHANF YTD gains are higher at: 36.360 vs. TGSGY (-9.671). TGSGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 403M vs. SHANF (-357M). SHANF has more cash in the bank: 568M vs. TGSGY (144M). TGSGY has less debt than SHANF: TGSGY (119M) vs SHANF (2.16B). SHANF has higher revenues than TGSGY: SHANF (2.61B) vs TGSGY (734M).
SHANFTGSGYSHANF / TGSGY
Capitalization453M1.72B26%
EBITDA-357M403M-89%
Gain YTD36.360-9.671-376%
P/E Ratio14.4929.7649%
Revenue2.61B734M356%
Total Cash568M144M394%
Total Debt2.16B119M1,817%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHANF vs TGSGY: Fundamental Ratings
SHANF
TGSGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
9778
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TGSGY's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHANF (57). This means that TGSGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHANF’s over the last 12 months.

SHANF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as TGSGY (100). This means that SHANF’s stock grew similarly to TGSGY’s over the last 12 months.

TGSGY's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as SHANF (97). This means that TGSGY’s stock grew similarly to SHANF’s over the last 12 months.

SHANF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as TGSGY (61). This means that SHANF’s stock grew similarly to TGSGY’s over the last 12 months.

SHANF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as TGSGY (100). This means that SHANF’s stock grew similarly to TGSGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHANFTGSGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGSGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMEIX18.470.08
+0.44%
Invesco Small Cap Equity R5
RNGBX57.870.25
+0.43%
American Funds New Economy R2
TSPIX5.910.01
+0.17%
Transamerica Small Cap Growth I2
OGGFX20.250.02
+0.10%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth I
RGCIX10.08N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure C

SHANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHANF and TGSGY have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHANF and TGSGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHANF
1D Price
Change %
SHANF100%
N/A
TGSGY - SHANF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
SUBCY - SHANF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
SBFFY - SHANF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBFFF - SHANF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POFCY - SHANF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TGSGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGSGY has been loosely correlated with SUBCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGSGY jumps, then SUBCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGSGY
1D Price
Change %
TGSGY100%
-0.57%
SUBCY - TGSGY
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
NCSM - TGSGY
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
BKR - TGSGY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
SLB - TGSGY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
NOV - TGSGY
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
More