SHALF
Price
$0.56
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.03B
WTBDY
Price
$9.79
Change
+$0.21 (+2.19%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
8.85B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHALF vs WTBDY

Header iconSHALF vs WTBDY Comparison
Open Charts SHALF vs WTBDYBanner chart's image
Shangri-La Asia
Price$0.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization3.03B
Whitbread
Price$9.79
Change+$0.21 (+2.19%)
Volume$2.79K
Capitalization8.85B
SHALF vs WTBDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHALF vs. WTBDY commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHALF is a Buy and WTBDY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SHALF: $0.56 vs. WTBDY: $9.78)
Brand notoriety: SHALF and WTBDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHALF: 390% vs. WTBDY: 39%
Market capitalization -- SHALF: $3.03B vs. WTBDY: $8.85B
SHALF [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $3.03B. WTBDY’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $8.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $72.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $9.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHALF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWTBDY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SHALF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WTBDY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WTBDY is a better buy in the long-term than SHALF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHALF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTBDY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHALF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WTBDY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WTBDY is a better buy in the short-term than SHALF.

Price Growth

SHALF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WTBDY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +3.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+4.24% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTBDY($8.85B) has a higher market cap than SHALF($3.03B). WTBDY YTD gains are higher at: 7.463 vs. SHALF (-15.152). WTBDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 886M vs. SHALF (41.8M). WTBDY has higher revenues than SHALF: WTBDY (2.63B) vs SHALF (1.46B).
SHALFWTBDYSHALF / WTBDY
Capitalization3.03B8.85B34%
EBITDA41.8M886M5%
Gain YTD-15.1527.463-203%
P/E RatioN/A25.45-
Revenue1.46B2.63B56%
Total Cash780MN/A-
Total Debt6.18BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHALF vs WTBDY: Fundamental Ratings
SHALF
WTBDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
9794
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5844
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WTBDY's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (79). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

WTBDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHALF (100). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

WTBDY's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (97). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

WTBDY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (61). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

WTBDY's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (58). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHALFWTBDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IJR109.491.93
+1.79%
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
RSEE29.950.39
+1.32%
Rareview Systematic Equity ETF
XDOC32.170.21
+0.65%
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF Oct
MQY11.030.07
+0.64%
Blackrock Muni Yield Quality Fund
NBCM22.28-0.09
-0.38%
Neuberger Berman Commodity Stgy ETF

SHALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHALF and WTBDY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHALF and WTBDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHALF
1D Price
Change %
SHALF100%
N/A
WTBDY - SHALF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
SKTP - SHALF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHALY - SHALF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRSI - SHALF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNRIF - SHALF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WTBDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTBDY has been loosely correlated with ACCYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTBDY jumps, then ACCYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTBDY
1D Price
Change %
WTBDY100%
+2.25%
ACCYY - WTBDY
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
NHHEF - WTBDY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATAT - WTBDY
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
SHALF - WTBDY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHCO - WTBDY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More