SGGTF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.46M
VLMZF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.02 (+20.00%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
6.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SGGTF vs VLMZF

Header iconSGGTF vs VLMZF Comparison
Open Charts SGGTF vs VLMZFBanner chart's image
SIGNATURE RES LTD CDA
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization6.46M
Volcanic Gold Mines
Price$0.12
Change+$0.02 (+20.00%)
Volume$8.5K
Capitalization6.61M
SGGTF vs VLMZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SGGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLMZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SGGTF vs. VLMZF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGGTF is a Buy and VLMZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SGGTF: $0.04 vs. VLMZF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: SGGTF and VLMZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SGGTF: 8% vs. VLMZF: 35%
Market capitalization -- SGGTF: $6.46M vs. VLMZF: $6.61M
SGGTF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $6.46M. VLMZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $89.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SGGTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLMZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SGGTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLMZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLMZF is a better buy in the long-term than SGGTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGGTF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLMZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SGGTF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • VLMZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGGTF is a better buy in the short-term than VLMZF.

Price Growth

SGGTF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -8.76% price change this week, while VLMZF (@Precious Metals) price change was +14.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4956.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VLMZF($6.61M) and SGGTF($6.46M) have the same market capitalization . VLMZF YTD gains are higher at: 100.000 vs. SGGTF (50.000). VLMZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.91M vs. SGGTF (-3.64M). SGGTF has more cash in the bank: 708K vs. VLMZF (516K). VLMZF has less debt than SGGTF: VLMZF (93.6K) vs SGGTF (200K). SGGTF (0) and VLMZF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SGGTFVLMZFSGGTF / VLMZF
Capitalization6.46M6.61M98%
EBITDA-3.64M-1.91M190%
Gain YTD50.000100.00050%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash708K516K137%
Total Debt200K93.6K214%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGGTF vs VLMZF: Fundamental Ratings
SGGTF
VLMZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5643
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5014

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLMZF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as SGGTF (74). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to SGGTF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SGGTF (100). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to SGGTF’s over the last 12 months.

SGGTF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as VLMZF (99). This means that SGGTF’s stock grew similarly to VLMZF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMZF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SGGTF (64). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to SGGTF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMZF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SGGTF (100). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to SGGTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGGTFVLMZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SGGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLMZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFIN10.790.36
+3.45%
Medallion Financial Corp
TKR77.422.30
+3.06%
Timken Company (The)
HLIT9.920.15
+1.54%
Harmonic
EDRY10.90N/A
N/A
EuroDry Ltd
BP34.30-0.16
-0.46%
BP plc

SGGTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGGTF and VLMZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGGTF and VLMZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGGTF
1D Price
Change %
SGGTF100%
+5.34%
VLMZF - SGGTF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONXGF - SGGTF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.69%

VLMZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLMZF and WFRSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLMZF and WFRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLMZF
1D Price
Change %
VLMZF100%
N/A
WFRSF - VLMZF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGGTF - VLMZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.34%
VGMIF - VLMZF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLCJF - VLMZF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VITFF - VLMZF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More