SGGTF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
14.84M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SIREF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.10 (+200.00%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
61.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SGGTF vs SIREF

Header iconSGGTF vs SIREF Comparison
Open Charts SGGTF vs SIREFBanner chart's image
SIGNATURE RES LTD CDA
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$40K
Capitalization14.84M
Sirios Resources
Price$0.15
Change+$0.10 (+200.00%)
Volume$256.78K
Capitalization61.1M
SGGTF vs SIREF Comparison Chart in %
SGGTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SIREF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SGGTF vs. SIREF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGGTF is a Buy and SIREF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (SGGTF: $0.08 vs. SIREF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: SGGTF and SIREF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SGGTF: 118% vs. SIREF: 33%
Market capitalization -- SGGTF: $14.84M vs. SIREF: $61.1M
SGGTF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $14.84M. SIREF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $61.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $146.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SGGTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSIREF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SGGTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SIREF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SIREF is a better buy in the long-term than SGGTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGGTF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIREF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SGGTF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SIREF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGGTF is a better buy in the short-term than SIREF.

Price Growth

SGGTF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.42% price change this week, while SIREF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +8.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +96.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+8.13% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SIREF($61.1M) has a higher market cap than SGGTF($14.8M). SGGTF YTD gains are higher at: 50.368 vs. SIREF (-18.919). SIREF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.05M vs. SGGTF (-3.6M). SIREF has more cash in the bank: 2.38M vs. SGGTF (50.2K). SIREF has less debt than SGGTF: SIREF (73.4K) vs SGGTF (200K). SGGTF (0) and SIREF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SGGTFSIREFSGGTF / SIREF
Capitalization14.8M61.1M24%
EBITDA-3.6M-1.05M341%
Gain YTD50.368-18.919-266%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash50.2K2.38M2%
Total Debt200K73.4K272%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGGTF vs SIREF: Fundamental Ratings
SGGTF
SIREF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3066
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
9590
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10037
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGGTF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as SIREF (87). This means that SGGTF’s stock grew similarly to SIREF’s over the last 12 months.

SIREF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as SGGTF (100). This means that SIREF’s stock grew similarly to SGGTF’s over the last 12 months.

SIREF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as SGGTF (95). This means that SIREF’s stock grew similarly to SGGTF’s over the last 12 months.

SIREF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SGGTF (35). This means that SIREF’s stock grew similarly to SGGTF’s over the last 12 months.

SIREF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGGTF (100). This means that SIREF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGGTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGGTFSIREF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SGGTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SIREF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STLE33.251.25
+3.91%
Steele Bancorp Inc.
HUTCY2.10N/A
N/A
Hutchison Telecommunications Hong Kong Holdings Ltd.
NLGCF0.18N/A
N/A
Northern Lion Gold Corp.
PMOIF3.07N/A
N/A
Harbour Energy Plc
TELNY16.37-0.78
-4.55%
Telenor ASA

SGGTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGGTF and ONXGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGGTF and ONXGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGGTF
1D Price
Change %
SGGTF100%
N/A
ONXGF - SGGTF
26%
Poorly correlated
+13.49%
VLMZF - SGGTF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIREF - SGGTF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%

SIREF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIREF and SGGTF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIREF and SGGTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIREF
1D Price
Change %
SIREF100%
+0.50%
SGGTF - SIREF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A