SGBLY
Price
$13.82
Change
+$0.31 (+2.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
21.99B
TFC
Price
$46.52
Change
-$0.55 (-1.17%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
59.98B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SGBLY vs TFC

Header iconSGBLY vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts SGBLY vs TFCBanner chart's image
Standard Bank Group
Price$13.82
Change+$0.31 (+2.29%)
Volume$19.91K
Capitalization21.99B
Truist Financial
Price$46.52
Change-$0.55 (-1.17%)
Volume$7.85M
Capitalization59.98B
SGBLY vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SGBLY vs. TFC commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGBLY is a StrongBuy and TFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SGBLY: $13.82 vs. TFC: $46.52)
Brand notoriety: SGBLY and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SGBLY: 50% vs. TFC: 106%
Market capitalization -- SGBLY: $21.99B vs. TFC: $59.98B
SGBLY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $21.99B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $59.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SGBLY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SGBLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGBLY is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGBLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SGBLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than SGBLY.

Price Growth

SGBLY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.96% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

TFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($60B) has a higher market cap than SGBLY($22B). TFC has higher P/E ratio than SGBLY: TFC (12.61) vs SGBLY (8.79). SGBLY YTD gains are higher at: 22.493 vs. TFC (11.247). SGBLY has less debt than TFC: SGBLY (31.1B) vs TFC (61.1B).
SGBLYTFCSGBLY / TFC
Capitalization22B60B37%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.49311.247200%
P/E Ratio8.7912.6170%
Revenue196BN/A-
Total CashN/A5.16B-
Total Debt31.1B61.1B51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGBLY vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
SGBLY
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5015
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1266
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5025
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5643
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGBLY's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (75). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (66). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (4). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's Price Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as SGBLY (50). This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to SGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SGBLY (56). This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to SGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGBLYTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALTO1.170.02
+1.74%
Alto Ingredients
MEDP486.984.64
+0.96%
Medpace Holdings
JCSE1.05N/A
+0.47%
JE Cleantech Holdings Limited
FL24.01-0.09
-0.37%
Foot Locker
WEST5.26-0.16
-2.95%
Westrock Coffee Company

SGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGBLY has been closely correlated with NDBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGBLY jumps, then NDBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGBLY
1D Price
Change %
SGBLY100%
+2.29%
NDBKY - SGBLY
67%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
HBCP - SGBLY
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
AGRPY - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
TFC - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
BHKLY - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.59%
More

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
-1.17%
HBAN - TFC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
CFG - TFC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
PNC - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
FITB - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
KEY - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
More