SG
Price
$35.64
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
105 days until earnings call
SHAK
Price
$127.63
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
91 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SG vs SHAK

Header iconSG vs SHAK Comparison
Open Charts SG vs SHAKBanner chart's image
Sweetgreen
Price$35.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.88M
CapitalizationN/A
Shake Shack
Price$127.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$779.47K
CapitalizationN/A
SG vs SHAK Comparison Chart
Loading...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SG vs. SHAK commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SG is a Hold and SHAK is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (SG: $35.64 vs. SHAK: $127.63)
Brand notoriety: SG: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SG: 125% vs. SHAK: 82%
Market capitalization -- SG: $4.12B vs. SHAK: $5.11B
SG [@Restaurants] is valued at $4.12B. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $5.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $213.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SG is a better buy in the long-term than SHAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHAK is a better buy in the short-term than SG.

Price Growth

SG (@Restaurants) experienced а -14.41% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was -4.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

SG is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.26% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHAK($5.11B) has a higher market cap than SG($4.12B). SG YTD gains are higher at: 215.398 vs. SHAK (72.194).
SGSHAKSG / SHAK
Capitalization4.12B5.11B81%
EBITDAN/A108M-
Gain YTD215.39872.194298%
P/E RatioN/A638.15-
RevenueN/A1.21B-
Total CashN/A311M-
Total DebtN/A805M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SG vs SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
SG
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
468
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5064
SMR RATING
1..100
9587
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8396
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a8

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SG's Valuation (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SHAK (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

SG's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SHAK (64) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's SMR Rating (87) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (95) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

SG's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SHAK (37) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

SG's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SHAK (96) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGSHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
0%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
-5.96%
CAVA - SG
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
SHAK - SG
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
PTLO - SG
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
BROS - SG
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
KRUS - SG
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
More

SHAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHAK has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHAK jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHAK
1D Price
Change %
SHAK100%
-2.21%
CAKE - SHAK
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
TXRH - SHAK
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.24%
SG - SHAK
37%
Loosely correlated
-5.96%
DRI - SHAK
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
EAT - SHAK
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
More