SG
Price
$13.59
Change
-$0.06 (-0.44%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.6B
38 days until earnings call
SHAK
Price
$138.48
Change
+$0.06 (+0.04%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.57B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SG vs SHAK

Header iconSG vs SHAK Comparison
Open Charts SG vs SHAKBanner chart's image
Sweetgreen
Price$13.59
Change-$0.06 (-0.44%)
Volume$4.15M
Capitalization1.6B
Shake Shack
Price$138.48
Change+$0.06 (+0.04%)
Volume$1.71M
Capitalization5.57B
SG vs SHAK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SG vs. SHAK commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SG is a Buy and SHAK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SG: $13.59 vs. SHAK: $138.48)
Brand notoriety: SG: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SG: 80% vs. SHAK: 115%
Market capitalization -- SG: $1.6B vs. SHAK: $5.57B
SG [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.6B. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $5.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHAK is a better buy in the long-term than SG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SG and SHAK are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SG (@Restaurants) experienced а +10.72% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was +4.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

SG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHAK($5.57B) has a higher market cap than SG($1.6B). SHAK YTD gains are higher at: 6.687 vs. SG (-57.626). SHAK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 125M vs. SG (-21.47M). SHAK has more cash in the bank: 313M vs. SG (184M). SG has less debt than SHAK: SG (329M) vs SHAK (824M). SHAK has higher revenues than SG: SHAK (1.28B) vs SG (685M).
SGSHAKSG / SHAK
Capitalization1.6B5.57B29%
EBITDA-21.47M125M-17%
Gain YTD-57.6266.687-862%
P/E RatioN/A477.52-
Revenue685M1.28B53%
Total Cash184M313M59%
Total Debt329M824M40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SG vs SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
SG
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2188
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8445
SMR RATING
1..100
9487
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
754
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHAK's Valuation (97) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SG (84) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SG’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's SMR Rating (87) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (94) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (65) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SG (75) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew significantly faster than SG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGSHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
80%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNTCX25.020.15
+0.60%
Steward International Enhanced Index I
OGRIX34.350.13
+0.38%
Invesco Comstock Select R6
LEQCX11.450.04
+0.35%
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
AVLIX8.000.02
+0.25%
American Century Value I
THISX77.14-0.29
-0.37%
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences I

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
-0.48%
CAVA - SG
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
CMG - SG
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
SHAK - SG
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
RICK - SG
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
PTLO - SG
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
More

SHAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHAK has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHAK jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHAK
1D Price
Change %
SHAK100%
+0.04%
CAKE - SHAK
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
TXRH - SHAK
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
CAVA - SHAK
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
EAT - SHAK
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
KRUS - SHAK
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
More