SFTBY
Price
$55.70
Change
+$3.38 (+6.46%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
159.92B
81 days until earnings call
SMNUF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.25B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFTBY vs SMNUF

Header iconSFTBY vs SMNUF Comparison
Open Charts SFTBY vs SMNUFBanner chart's image
Softbank Group
Price$55.70
Change+$3.38 (+6.46%)
Volume$1.35M
Capitalization159.92B
Pt Sarana Menara Nusantara, Tbk
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$3.2K
Capitalization2.25B
SFTBY vs SMNUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SFTBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFTBY vs. SMNUF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFTBY is a Buy and SMNUF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SFTBY: $55.70 vs. SMNUF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: SFTBY and SMNUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFTBY: 168% vs. SMNUF: 75%
Market capitalization -- SFTBY: $159.92B vs. SMNUF: $2.25B
SFTBY [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $159.92B. SMNUF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $286.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFTBY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMNUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SFTBY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMNUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SFTBY and SMNUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFTBY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMNUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFTBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMNUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMNUF is a better buy in the short-term than SFTBY.

Price Growth

SFTBY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +18.13% price change this week, while SMNUF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

SFTBY is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.96% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFTBY($160B) has a higher market cap than SMNUF($2.25B). SFTBY has higher P/E ratio than SMNUF: SFTBY (21.03) vs SMNUF (5.17). SFTBY YTD gains are higher at: 93.269 vs. SMNUF (-53.319). SMNUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.69T vs. SFTBY (3.83T). SFTBY has more cash in the bank: 5.44T vs. SMNUF (824B). SFTBY has less debt than SMNUF: SFTBY (20.33T) vs SMNUF (50.78T). SMNUF has higher revenues than SFTBY: SMNUF (12.98T) vs SFTBY (7T).
SFTBYSMNUFSFTBY / SMNUF
Capitalization160B2.25B7,098%
EBITDA3.83T6.69T57%
Gain YTD93.269-53.319-175%
P/E Ratio21.035.17407%
Revenue7T12.98T54%
Total Cash5.44T824B660%
Total Debt20.33T50.78T40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFTBY vs SMNUF: Fundamental Ratings
SFTBY
SMNUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2435
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48100
SMR RATING
1..100
10018
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3588
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5029

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMNUF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFTBY (85). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFTBY’s over the last 12 months.

SFTBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMNUF (100). This means that SFTBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNUF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFTBY (100). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew significantly faster than SFTBY’s over the last 12 months.

SFTBY's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMNUF (88). This means that SFTBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNUF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as SFTBY (100). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew similarly to SFTBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFTBYSMNUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFTBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JAOSX54.060.54
+1.01%
Janus Henderson Overseas T
JMNCX13.100.02
+0.15%
JPMorgan Research Market Neutral C
VPMAX183.91-0.07
-0.04%
Vanguard PRIMECAP Adm
ICSSX13.13-0.08
-0.61%
VY® Columbia Small Cap Value II S
LMCHX32.91-0.23
-0.69%
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R6

SFTBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFTBY has been closely correlated with SFTBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFTBY jumps, then SFTBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFTBY
1D Price
Change %
SFTBY100%
+6.46%
SFTBF - SFTBY
73%
Closely correlated
+6.65%
TLGPY - SFTBY
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
HTWSF - SFTBY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMX - SFTBY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
SOBKY - SFTBY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
More

SMNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMNUF has been loosely correlated with TCMFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMNUF jumps, then TCMFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMNUF
1D Price
Change %
SMNUF100%
N/A
TCMFF - SMNUF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SFTBF - SMNUF
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.65%
SFTBY - SMNUF
10%
Poorly correlated
+6.46%
SWZCF - SMNUF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
QBCRF - SMNUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More