SFTBF
Price
$112.00
Change
+$6.98 (+6.65%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
159.92B
81 days until earnings call
SMNUF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.25B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFTBF vs SMNUF

Header iconSFTBF vs SMNUF Comparison
Open Charts SFTBF vs SMNUFBanner chart's image
Softbank Group
Price$112.00
Change+$6.98 (+6.65%)
Volume$3.79K
Capitalization159.92B
Pt Sarana Menara Nusantara, Tbk
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$3.2K
Capitalization2.25B
SFTBF vs SMNUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SFTBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFTBF vs. SMNUF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFTBF is a Buy and SMNUF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (SFTBF: $112.00 vs. SMNUF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: SFTBF and SMNUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFTBF: 85% vs. SMNUF: 75%
Market capitalization -- SFTBF: $159.92B vs. SMNUF: $2.25B
SFTBF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $159.92B. SMNUF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $286.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFTBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMNUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SFTBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMNUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SFTBF and SMNUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFTBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMNUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFTBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMNUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SFTBF and SMNUF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SFTBF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +19.15% price change this week, while SMNUF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

SFTBF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.96% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFTBF($160B) has a higher market cap than SMNUF($2.25B). SFTBF has higher P/E ratio than SMNUF: SFTBF (21.15) vs SMNUF (5.17). SFTBF YTD gains are higher at: 94.107 vs. SMNUF (-53.319). SMNUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.69T vs. SFTBF (3.83T). SFTBF has more cash in the bank: 5.44T vs. SMNUF (824B). SFTBF has less debt than SMNUF: SFTBF (20.33T) vs SMNUF (50.78T). SMNUF has higher revenues than SFTBF: SMNUF (12.98T) vs SFTBF (7T).
SFTBFSMNUFSFTBF / SMNUF
Capitalization160B2.25B7,098%
EBITDA3.83T6.69T57%
Gain YTD94.107-53.319-176%
P/E Ratio21.155.17409%
Revenue7T12.98T54%
Total Cash5.44T824B660%
Total Debt20.33T50.78T40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFTBF vs SMNUF: Fundamental Ratings
SFTBF
SMNUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2635
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
10018
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3588
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1429

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMNUF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFTBF (84). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFTBF’s over the last 12 months.

SFTBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMNUF (100). This means that SFTBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNUF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFTBF (100). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew significantly faster than SFTBF’s over the last 12 months.

SFTBF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMNUF (88). This means that SFTBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNUF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as SFTBF (100). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew similarly to SFTBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFTBFSMNUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFTBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JAOSX54.060.54
+1.01%
Janus Henderson Overseas T
JMNCX13.100.02
+0.15%
JPMorgan Research Market Neutral C
VPMAX183.91-0.07
-0.04%
Vanguard PRIMECAP Adm
ICSSX13.13-0.08
-0.61%
VY® Columbia Small Cap Value II S
LMCHX32.91-0.23
-0.69%
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R6

SFTBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFTBF has been closely correlated with SFTBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFTBF jumps, then SFTBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFTBF
1D Price
Change %
SFTBF100%
+6.65%
SFTBY - SFTBF
73%
Closely correlated
+6.46%
SNGNF - SFTBF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTXKY - SFTBF
11%
Poorly correlated
-19.59%
SMNUF - SFTBF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGAPY - SFTBF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More

SMNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMNUF has been loosely correlated with TCMFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMNUF jumps, then TCMFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMNUF
1D Price
Change %
SMNUF100%
N/A
TCMFF - SMNUF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SFTBF - SMNUF
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.65%
SFTBY - SMNUF
10%
Poorly correlated
+6.46%
SWZCF - SMNUF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
QBCRF - SMNUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More