Advertisement
SFSVF vs TRUG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFSVF is a Hold and TRUG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SFSVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SFSVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TRUG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TRUG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- TRUG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SFSVF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRUG (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -0.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.83%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
TRUG is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.49% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Electronics/Appliances (+0.17% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| SFSVF | TRUG | SFSVF / TRUG | |
| Capitalization | 491M | 5.14M | 9,545% |
| EBITDA | 7.3B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.910 | -84.838 | 16% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.30 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 36.6B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 21.3B | 178K | 11,966,292% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 10.1M | - |
| SFSVF | TRUG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 4% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 5% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 26 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 33% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HWACX | 35.48 | 0.26 | +0.74% |
| Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C | |||
| FTZIX | 54.69 | 0.29 | +0.53% |
| FullerThaler Behavrl Uncnstd Eq | |||
| FIOOX | 17.37 | 0.08 | +0.46% |
| Fidelity Series Large Cap Value Index | |||
| SSCDX | 17.86 | 0.07 | +0.39% |
| Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth I | |||
| NBMLX | 19.17 | -0.20 | -1.03% |
| Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Inst | |||
SFSVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFSVF has been loosely correlated with CRWRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFSVF jumps, then CRWRF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFSVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFSVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRWRF - SFSVF | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TMOAF - SFSVF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ALIT - SFSVF | 36% Loosely correlated | -4.51% | ||
| WORX - SFSVF | 34% Loosely correlated | -6.82% | ||
| TRUG - SFSVF | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
More | ||||
TRUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRUG has been loosely correlated with CALX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRUG jumps, then CALX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRUG | 100% | -3.05% | ||
| CALX - TRUG | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| NEXOF - TRUG | 32% Poorly correlated | +11.49% | ||
| SFSVF - TRUG | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VERI - TRUG | 25% Poorly correlated | +22.94% | ||
| ADEA - TRUG | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.27% | ||
More | ||||