Advertisement
SFSVF vs TRUG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFSVF is a Hold and TRUG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SFSVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SFSVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TRUG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TRUG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- TRUG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
SFSVF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRUG (@Recreational Products) price change was -20.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.62%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.01%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (-1.62% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Recreational Products (+0.66% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| SFSVF | TRUG | SFSVF / TRUG | |
| Capitalization | 480M | 2.79M | 17,186% |
| EBITDA | 7.3B | -2.29M | -318,845% |
| Gain YTD | -13.910 | -93.655 | 15% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.22 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 36.6B | 22.7M | 161,233% |
| Total Cash | 21.3B | 13.7M | 155,474% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 8.32M | - |
| SFSVF | TRUG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 4% | 8 days ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 4% | 8 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | about 1 month ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
SFSVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFSVF has been loosely correlated with CRWRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFSVF jumps, then CRWRF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFSVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFSVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRWRF - SFSVF | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TMOAF - SFSVF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ALIT - SFSVF | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| WORX - SFSVF | 34% Loosely correlated | +8.47% | ||
| TRUG - SFSVF | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||
TRUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRUG has been loosely correlated with CALX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRUG jumps, then CALX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRUG | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| CALX - TRUG | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| NEXOF - TRUG | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SFSVF - TRUG | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VERI - TRUG | 25% Poorly correlated | +4.40% | ||
| ADEA - TRUG | 24% Poorly correlated | +5.27% | ||
More | ||||