SFSVF vs TRUG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFSVF is a Hold and TRUG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SFSVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SFSVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TRUG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TRUG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- TRUG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
SFSVF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRUG (@Packaged Software) price change was -22.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
TRUG is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.61% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| SFSVF | TRUG | SFSVF / TRUG | |
| Capitalization | 381M | 17M | 2,241% |
| EBITDA | 6.28B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.070 | -96.158 | -40% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.63 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 31.1B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 8.97B | 178K | 5,039,888% |
| Total Debt | 0 | 2.15M | - |
| TRUG | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% |
SFSVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFSVF has been loosely correlated with CRWRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFSVF jumps, then CRWRF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFSVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFSVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRWRF - SFSVF | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SWDAF - SFSVF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TMOAF - SFSVF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ALIT - SFSVF | 36% Loosely correlated | -6.29% | ||
| WORX - SFSVF | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||
TRUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRUG has been loosely correlated with RTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRUG jumps, then RTC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRUG | 100% | -4.75% | ||
| RTC - TRUG | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.01% | ||
| CALX - TRUG | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| NEXOF - TRUG | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SFSVF - TRUG | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CMAX - TRUG | 23% Poorly correlated | -4.05% | ||
More | ||||