SFSVF
Price
$89.00
Change
+$24.54 (+38.07%)
Updated
Mar 8 closing price
TRUG
Price
$0.36
Change
-$0.04 (-10.00%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

SFSVF vs TRUG

Header iconSFSVF vs TRUG Comparison
Open Charts SFSVF vs TRUGBanner chart's image
Software Service
Price$89.00
Change+$24.54 (+38.07%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
TruGolf Holdings
Price$0.36
Change-$0.04 (-10.00%)
Volume$17.55K
CapitalizationN/A
SFSVF vs TRUG Comparison Chart
Loading...
TRUG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFSVF vs. TRUG commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFSVF is a Hold and TRUG is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (SFSVF: $89.00 vs. TRUG: $0.40)
Brand notoriety: SFSVF and TRUG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFSVF: 100% vs. TRUG: 70%
Market capitalization -- SFSVF: $380.86M vs. TRUG: $16.97M
SFSVF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $380.86M. TRUG’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $16.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFSVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SFSVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRUG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFSVF is a better buy in the long-term than TRUG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TRUG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TRUG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

SFSVF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRUG (@Packaged Software) price change was -13.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

TRUG is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFSVF($381M) has a higher market cap than TRUG($17M). SFSVF YTD gains are higher at: 38.070 vs. TRUG (-96.591). SFSVF has more cash in the bank: 8.97B vs. TRUG (178K). SFSVF has less debt than TRUG: SFSVF (0) vs TRUG (2.15M).
SFSVFTRUGSFSVF / TRUG
Capitalization381M17M2,241%
EBITDA6.28BN/A-
Gain YTD38.070-96.591-39%
P/E Ratio12.63N/A-
Revenue31.1BN/A-
Total Cash8.97B178K5,039,888%
Total Debt02.15M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TRUG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TRUG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

SFSVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFSVF has been loosely correlated with CRWRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFSVF jumps, then CRWRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFSVF
1D Price
Change %
SFSVF100%
N/A
CRWRF - SFSVF
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SWDAF - SFSVF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TMOAF - SFSVF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALIT - SFSVF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
WORX - SFSVF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
More

TRUG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRUG has been loosely correlated with RTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRUG jumps, then RTC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRUG
1D Price
Change %
TRUG100%
-22.12%
RTC - TRUG
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.64%
CALX - TRUG
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
NEXOF - TRUG
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFSVF - TRUG
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GENTF - TRUG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More