Advertisement
SFSVF vs TMOAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFSVF is a Hold and TMOAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SFSVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMOAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SFSVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TMOAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TMOAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- TMOAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
SFSVF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TMOAF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.83%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.49% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Packaged Software (-1.63% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| SFSVF | TMOAF | SFSVF / TMOAF | |
| Capitalization | 491M | 734M | 67% |
| EBITDA | 7.3B | 38.2M | 19,110% |
| Gain YTD | -13.910 | 9.221 | -151% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.30 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 36.6B | 570M | 6,421% |
| Total Cash | 21.3B | 267M | 7,978% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 41.1M | - |
TMOAF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SFSVF | TMOAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 31% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 4% | 4 days ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 5% | 4 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HWACX | 35.48 | 0.26 | +0.74% |
| Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C | |||
| FTZIX | 54.69 | 0.29 | +0.53% |
| FullerThaler Behavrl Uncnstd Eq | |||
| FIOOX | 17.37 | 0.08 | +0.46% |
| Fidelity Series Large Cap Value Index | |||
| SSCDX | 17.86 | 0.07 | +0.39% |
| Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth I | |||
| NBMLX | 19.17 | -0.20 | -1.03% |
| Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Inst | |||
SFSVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFSVF has been loosely correlated with CRWRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFSVF jumps, then CRWRF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFSVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFSVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRWRF - SFSVF | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TMOAF - SFSVF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ALIT - SFSVF | 36% Loosely correlated | -4.51% | ||
| WORX - SFSVF | 34% Loosely correlated | -6.82% | ||
| TRUG - SFSVF | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
More | ||||
TMOAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMOAF has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMOAF jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMOAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMOAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PATH - TMOAF | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| NTNX - TMOAF | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| SFSVF - TMOAF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MDB - TMOAF | 31% Poorly correlated | -8.20% | ||
| NOW - TMOAF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
More | ||||