SFSHF
Price
$9.76
Change
+$1.02 (+11.67%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.48B
SURVF
Price
$0.87
Change
+$0.02 (+2.35%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.78B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFSHF vs SURVF

Header iconSFSHF vs SURVF Comparison
Open Charts SFSHF vs SURVFBanner chart's image
Safestore Holdings
Price$9.76
Change+$1.02 (+11.67%)
Volume$1.11K
Capitalization2.48B
Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$0.87
Change+$0.02 (+2.35%)
Volume$514
Capitalization2.78B
SFSHF vs SURVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SFSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SURVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFSHF vs. SURVF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFSHF is a Hold and SURVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SFSHF: $9.76 vs. SURVF: $0.87)
Brand notoriety: SFSHF and SURVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFSHF: 167% vs. SURVF: 36%
Market capitalization -- SFSHF: $2.48B vs. SURVF: $2.78B
SFSHF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.48B. SURVF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFSHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSURVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SFSHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SURVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFSHF is a better buy in the long-term than SURVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFSHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SURVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFSHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SURVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFSHF is a better buy in the short-term than SURVF.

Price Growth

SFSHF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +11.70% price change this week, while SURVF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.52% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SURVF($2.78B) has a higher market cap than SFSHF($2.48B). SURVF has higher P/E ratio than SFSHF: SURVF (13.68) vs SFSHF (6.60). SFSHF YTD gains are higher at: 24.262 vs. SURVF (0.926). SURVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 462M vs. SFSHF (337M). SURVF has more cash in the bank: 214M vs. SFSHF (18.1M). SFSHF has less debt than SURVF: SFSHF (795M) vs SURVF (4.31B). SURVF has higher revenues than SFSHF: SURVF (448M) vs SFSHF (222M).
SFSHFSURVFSFSHF / SURVF
Capitalization2.48B2.78B89%
EBITDA337M462M73%
Gain YTD24.2620.9262,621%
P/E Ratio6.6013.6848%
Revenue222M448M50%
Total Cash18.1M214M8%
Total Debt795M4.31B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFSHF vs SURVF: Fundamental Ratings
SFSHF
SURVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
7796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4355
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7815
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFSHF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SURVF (62). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to SURVF’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as SURVF (100). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to SURVF’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as SURVF (96). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to SURVF’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SURVF (55). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to SURVF’s over the last 12 months.

SURVF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFSHF (78). This means that SURVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFSHFSURVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SURVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RICGX63.570.60
+0.95%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R6
ABVCX18.240.11
+0.61%
AB Large Cap Value C
FIVFX32.700.18
+0.55%
Fidelity International Capital Apprec
GMEYX13.350.07
+0.53%
GuideStone Funds Impact Equity Instl
MKILX21.04-0.01
-0.05%
BlackRock International K

SFSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFSHF and ARSSF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFSHF and ARSSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFSHF
1D Price
Change %
SFSHF100%
N/A
ARSSF - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSGOF - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OGCP - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPGF - SFSHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STGPF - SFSHF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SURVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SURVF and EFRTF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SURVF and EFRTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SURVF
1D Price
Change %
SURVF100%
N/A
EFRTF - SURVF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
MRTI - SURVF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
ATRRF - SURVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFSHF - SURVF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WDPSF - SURVF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More