SFSHF
Price
$9.76
Change
+$1.02 (+11.67%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.48B
SLTTF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.05 (-17.86%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
44.19M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFSHF vs SLTTF

Header iconSFSHF vs SLTTF Comparison
Open Charts SFSHF vs SLTTFBanner chart's image
Safestore Holdings
Price$9.76
Change+$1.02 (+11.67%)
Volume$1.11K
Capitalization2.48B
RAVELIN PPTYS REIT
Price$0.23
Change-$0.05 (-17.86%)
Volume$300
Capitalization44.19M
SFSHF vs SLTTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SFSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLTTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFSHF vs. SLTTF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFSHF is a Hold and SLTTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SFSHF: $9.76 vs. SLTTF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: SFSHF and SLTTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFSHF: 167% vs. SLTTF: 8%
Market capitalization -- SFSHF: $2.48B vs. SLTTF: $44.19M
SFSHF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.48B. SLTTF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $44.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFSHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLTTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SFSHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLTTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFSHF is a better buy in the long-term than SLTTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFSHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLTTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFSHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLTTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFSHF is a better buy in the short-term than SLTTF.

Price Growth

SFSHF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +11.70% price change this week, while SLTTF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -16.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.52% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFSHF($2.48B) has a higher market cap than SLTTF($44.2M). SFSHF has higher P/E ratio than SLTTF: SFSHF (6.60) vs SLTTF (4.11). SFSHF YTD gains are higher at: 24.262 vs. SLTTF (-39.187). SFSHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 337M vs. SLTTF (-69.11M). SFSHF has more cash in the bank: 18.1M vs. SLTTF (11.3M). SFSHF has less debt than SLTTF: SFSHF (795M) vs SLTTF (983M). SFSHF has higher revenues than SLTTF: SFSHF (222M) vs SLTTF (198M).
SFSHFSLTTFSFSHF / SLTTF
Capitalization2.48B44.2M5,618%
EBITDA337M-69.11M-488%
Gain YTD24.262-39.187-62%
P/E Ratio6.604.11161%
Revenue222M198M112%
Total Cash18.1M11.3M160%
Total Debt795M983M81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFSHF vs SLTTF: Fundamental Ratings
SFSHF
SLTTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
7799
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4365
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7897
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLTTF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as SFSHF (49). This means that SLTTF’s stock grew similarly to SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as SLTTF (100). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to SLTTF’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as SLTTF (99). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to SLTTF’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SLTTF (65). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to SLTTF’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as SLTTF (97). This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to SLTTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFSHFSLTTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLTTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JWGRX125.371.00
+0.80%
Janus Henderson Global Research S
HULIX34.490.24
+0.70%
Huber Select Large Cap Value Inv
NDGAX24.210.09
+0.37%
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth A
RIDCX26.750.09
+0.34%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R3
PINRX15.570.03
+0.19%
Principal Diversified Intl R3

SFSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFSHF and ARSSF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFSHF and ARSSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFSHF
1D Price
Change %
SFSHF100%
N/A
ARSSF - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSGOF - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OGCP - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPGF - SFSHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STGPF - SFSHF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLTTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLTTF and PPRQF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLTTF and PPRQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLTTF
1D Price
Change %
SLTTF100%
-16.17%
PPRQF - SLTTF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STKAF - SLTTF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUERF - SLTTF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFSHF - SLTTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SURVF - SLTTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More