SFOSF
Price
$1.96
Change
-$0.01 (-0.51%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
10.9B
TKPHF
Price
$27.72
Change
+$1.02 (+3.82%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
47.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFOSF vs TKPHF

Header iconSFOSF vs TKPHF Comparison
Open Charts SFOSF vs TKPHFBanner chart's image
Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Group
Price$1.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.51%)
Volume$500
Capitalization10.9B
Takeda Pharmaceutical
Price$27.72
Change+$1.02 (+3.82%)
Volume$311.13K
Capitalization47.94B
SFOSF vs TKPHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SFOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TKPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFOSF vs. TKPHF commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFOSF is a Hold and TKPHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (SFOSF: $1.96 vs. TKPHF: $27.72)
Brand notoriety: SFOSF and TKPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFOSF: 67% vs. TKPHF: 427%
Market capitalization -- SFOSF: $10.9B vs. TKPHF: $47.94B
SFOSF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $10.9B. TKPHF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $47.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFOSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTKPHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SFOSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TKPHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TKPHF is a better buy in the long-term than SFOSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFOSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TKPHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFOSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TKPHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SFOSF and TKPHF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SFOSF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TKPHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -8.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +122.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +69.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+3.21% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TKPHF($47.9B) has a higher market cap than SFOSF($10.9B). TKPHF has higher P/E ratio than SFOSF: TKPHF (22.47) vs SFOSF (11.75). SFOSF YTD gains are higher at: 8.593 vs. TKPHF (3.626). TKPHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15T vs. SFOSF (6.12B). TKPHF has more cash in the bank: 369B vs. SFOSF (16.1B). SFOSF has less debt than TKPHF: SFOSF (30.8B) vs TKPHF (4.75T). TKPHF has higher revenues than SFOSF: TKPHF (4.11T) vs SFOSF (44.4B).
SFOSFTKPHFSFOSF / TKPHF
Capitalization10.9B47.9B23%
EBITDA6.12B1.15T1%
Gain YTD8.5933.626237%
P/E Ratio11.7522.4752%
Revenue44.4B4.11T1%
Total Cash16.1B369B4%
Total Debt30.8B4.75T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFOSF vs TKPHF: Fundamental Ratings
SFOSF
TKPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4492
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8185
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7978
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7320
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TKPHF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as SFOSF (24). This means that TKPHF’s stock grew similarly to SFOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TKPHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SFOSF (100). This means that TKPHF’s stock grew similarly to SFOSF’s over the last 12 months.

SFOSF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as TKPHF (85). This means that SFOSF’s stock grew similarly to TKPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TKPHF's Price Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as SFOSF (79). This means that TKPHF’s stock grew similarly to SFOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TKPHF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFOSF (73). This means that TKPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFOSFTKPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TKPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFBC97.014.40
+4.75%
Preferred Bank
APWC1.790.08
+4.68%
Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corp Ltd
DSGN4.050.07
+1.76%
Design Therapeutics
FROG41.95-0.30
-0.71%
JFrog Ltd
EL86.04-1.17
-1.34%
Estee Lauder Companies (The)

SFOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFOSF and BIOVF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFOSF and BIOVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFOSF
1D Price
Change %
SFOSF100%
N/A
BIOVF - SFOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TKPHF - SFOSF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.82%
PHCUF - SFOSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGIOF - SFOSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCNNF - SFOSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+8.32%
More

TKPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TKPHF and TCNNF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TKPHF and TCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TKPHF
1D Price
Change %
TKPHF100%
+3.82%
TCNNF - TKPHF
14%
Poorly correlated
+8.32%
CRYM - TKPHF
12%
Poorly correlated
-15.78%
VTRS - TKPHF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
AYRWF - TKPHF
9%
Poorly correlated
+29.09%
SGIOY - TKPHF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
More