SFOSF vs TKPHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFOSF is a Hold and TKPHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SFOSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTKPHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SFOSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TKPHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
SFOSF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +9.29% price change this week, while TKPHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -3.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -4.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.77%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-4.99% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| SFOSF | TKPHF | SFOSF / TKPHF | |
| Capitalization | 10.9B | 47.9B | 23% |
| EBITDA | 6.12B | 1.15T | 1% |
| Gain YTD | -8.676 | -9.746 | 89% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.75 | 22.47 | 52% |
| Revenue | 44.4B | 4.11T | 1% |
| Total Cash | 16.1B | 369B | 4% |
| Total Debt | 30.8B | 4.75T | 1% |
SFOSF | TKPHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TKPHF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as SFOSF (21). This means that TKPHF’s stock grew similarly to SFOSF’s over the last 12 months.
TKPHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SFOSF (100). This means that TKPHF’s stock grew similarly to SFOSF’s over the last 12 months.
TKPHF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as SFOSF (84). This means that TKPHF’s stock grew similarly to SFOSF’s over the last 12 months.
SFOSF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as TKPHF (58). This means that SFOSF’s stock grew similarly to TKPHF’s over the last 12 months.
SFOSF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TKPHF (92). This means that SFOSF’s stock grew significantly faster than TKPHF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
SFOSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SFOSF and BIOVF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFOSF and BIOVF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFOSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFOSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BIOVF - SFOSF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TKPHF - SFOSF | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.10% | ||
| PHCUF - SFOSF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SGIOF - SFOSF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PCYN - SFOSF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TKPHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TKPHF and TCNNF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TKPHF and TCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TKPHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKPHF | 100% | -3.10% | ||
| TCNNF - TKPHF | 14% Poorly correlated | -6.28% | ||
| CRYM - TKPHF | 12% Poorly correlated | +18.93% | ||
| VTRS - TKPHF | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.92% | ||
| AYRWF - TKPHF | 9% Poorly correlated | -9.30% | ||
| SGIOY - TKPHF | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||