Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SFGCX vs TEDSX
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts SFGCX vs TEDSX
NAA World Equity Income C
Price$13.51
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.62M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.89
Change-$0.16 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.67B
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SFGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFGCX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.67B vs. SFGCX (48.6M). SFGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: SFGCX (1.40) vs TEDSX (0.82). SFGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: SFGCX (27 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). SFGCX (2.28) is less costly to investors than TEDSX (1.96). SFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs SFGCX (2500). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.89 vs. SFGCX (7.88). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 12.34 vs. SFGCX (-1.56).
| SFGCX | TEDSX | SFGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.96 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 1.96 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.194 | 1.885 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.6M | 9.67B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.82 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.88 | 14.89 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.35 | 15.91 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.56 | 12.34 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.26 | 26.71 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement