Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SFGCX vs TEDSX
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts SFGCX vs TEDSX
NAA World Equity Income C
Price$14.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.21
Change-$0.09 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.36B
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SFGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFGCX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.36B vs. SFGCX (47M). SFGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: SFGCX (1.55) vs TEDSX (0.88). SFGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: SFGCX (27 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). SFGCX (2.28) is less costly to investors than TEDSX (1.96). SFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs SFGCX (2500). SFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. TEDSX (4.17). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 36.27 vs. SFGCX (19.36).
| SFGCX | TEDSX | SFGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.96 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 1.96 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.500 | 14.749 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47M | 9.36B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 0.88 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.69 | 4.17 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.27 | 16.02 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.36 | 36.27 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.64 | -0.04 | -100,331% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement