Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SFGCX vs TEDSX
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts SFGCX vs TEDSX
NAA World Equity Income C
Price$13.87
Change-$0.85 (-5.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.26M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.38
Change-$0.11 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.71B
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SFGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFGCX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.71B vs. SFGCX (49.3M). SFGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: SFGCX (1.35) vs TEDSX (0.79). SFGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: SFGCX (27 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). SFGCX (2.28) is less costly to investors than TEDSX (1.96). SFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs SFGCX (2500). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. SFGCX (7.54). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 16.32 vs. SFGCX (0.79).
| SFGCX | TEDSX | SFGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.96 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 1.96 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.917 | 3.450 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.3M | 9.71B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.79 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 11.97 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.72 | 15.51 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.79 | 16.32 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.07 | 29.34 | 154% |