Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SFGCX vs TEDSX
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts SFGCX vs TEDSX
NAA World Equity Income C
Price$15.26
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.09M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$33.04
Change+$0.30 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.44B
SFGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SFGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFGCX is a Buy and TEDSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.44B vs. SFGCX (48.1M). SFGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: SFGCX (1.79) vs TEDSX (0.74). SFGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: SFGCX (27 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). SFGCX (2.28) is less costly to investors than TEDSX (1.96). SFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs SFGCX (2500). SFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.26 vs. TEDSX (2.52). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 20.51 vs. SFGCX (16.80).
| SFGCX | TEDSX | SFGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.96 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 1.96 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.307 | 16.281 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.1M | 9.44B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.74 | 241% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.26 | 2.52 | 288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.06 | 13.96 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.80 | 20.51 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.54 | 7.81 | 673% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement