Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SFGCX vs TEDRX
SFGCX vs TEDRX Comparison
Open Charts SFGCX vs TEDRX
NAA World Equity Income C
Price$13.87
Change-$0.85 (-5.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.26M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R
Price$31.29
Change-$0.33 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.71B
SFGCX vs TEDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SFGCX vs. TEDRX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFGCX is a Buy and TEDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.71B vs. SFGCX (49.3M). TEDRX (1.38) and SFGCX (1.35) have matching dividends . SFGCX was incepted earlier than TEDRX: SFGCX (27 years) vs TEDRX (24 years). SFGCX (2.28) is less costly to investors than TEDRX (1.46). SFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. TEDRX (34.55). TEDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGCX: TEDRX (1000) vs SFGCX (2500). TEDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. SFGCX (7.54). TEDRX return over 5 years is better than : 17.25 vs. SFGCX (0.79).
| SFGCX | TEDRX | SFGCX / TEDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.46 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 1.46 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.917 | 3.472 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.3M | 9.71B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.38 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 12.22 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.72 | 16.45 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.79 | 17.25 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.07 | 29.52 | 153% |