SFES
Price
$0.70
Change
-$0.02 (-2.78%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
TNYZF
Price
$0.67
Change
-$0.01 (-1.47%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
534.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFES vs TNYZF

Header iconSFES vs TNYZF Comparison
Open Charts SFES vs TNYZFBanner chart's image
Safeguard Scientifics
Price$0.70
Change-$0.02 (-2.78%)
Volume$4.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Tiny
Price$0.67
Change-$0.01 (-1.47%)
Volume$9.01K
Capitalization534.8M
SFES vs TNYZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SFES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFES vs. TNYZF commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFES is a Hold and TNYZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (SFES: $0.70 vs. TNYZF: $0.67)
Brand notoriety: SFES and TNYZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFES: 16% vs. TNYZF: 15%
Market capitalization -- SFES: $0 vs. TNYZF: $534.8M
SFES [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. TNYZF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $534.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFES’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTNYZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SFES’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TNYZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNYZF is a better buy in the long-term than SFES.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFES’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNYZF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFES’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TNYZF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TNYZF is a better buy in the short-term than SFES.

Price Growth

SFES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -10.24% price change this week, while TNYZF (@Investment Managers) price change was -6.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFES YTD gains are higher at: -18.677 vs. TNYZF (-40.256).
SFESTNYZFSFES / TNYZF
CapitalizationN/A535M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-18.677-40.25646%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A9.13M-
Total DebtN/A46.6M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFES: Fundamental Ratings
SFES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFESTNYZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBFV28.400.84
+3.05%
CB Financial Services
TALK2.550.07
+2.82%
Talkspace
PLTK4.49N/A
+0.11%
Playtika Holding Corp
VEEE2.35N/A
N/A
Twin Vee PowerCats Co
ESS285.00-2.02
-0.70%
Essex Property Trust

SFES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFES and MRCC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFES and MRCC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFES
1D Price
Change %
SFES100%
-2.64%
MRCC - SFES
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
HFAHF - SFES
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHFCF - SFES
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSIF - SFES
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
CWD - SFES
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More

TNYZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TNYZF and BAM have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNYZF and BAM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNYZF
1D Price
Change %
TNYZF100%
-1.74%
BAM - TNYZF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
SFES - TNYZF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
DEFG - TNYZF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.47%
ALTI - TNYZF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
MSIF - TNYZF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
More