SFDL
Price
$30.33
Change
+$0.23 (+0.76%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
81.33M
SGBLY
Price
$13.15
Change
+$0.20 (+1.54%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.82B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFDL vs SGBLY

Header iconSFDL vs SGBLY Comparison
Open Charts SFDL vs SGBLYBanner chart's image
Security Federal
Price$30.33
Change+$0.23 (+0.76%)
Volume$500
Capitalization81.33M
Standard Bank Group
Price$13.15
Change+$0.20 (+1.54%)
Volume$15.79K
Capitalization17.82B
SFDL vs SGBLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SFDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFDL vs. SGBLY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFDL is a Hold and SGBLY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SFDL: $30.33 vs. SGBLY: $13.15)
Brand notoriety: SFDL and SGBLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFDL: 45% vs. SGBLY: 62%
Market capitalization -- SFDL: $81.33M vs. SGBLY: $17.82B
SFDL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $81.33M. SGBLY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $17.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFDL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSGBLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SFDL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SGBLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGBLY is a better buy in the long-term than SFDL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFDL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGBLY’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFDL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SGBLY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGBLY is a better buy in the short-term than SFDL.

Price Growth

SFDL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.94% price change this week, while SGBLY (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGBLY($17.8B) has a higher market cap than SFDL($81.3M). SGBLY has higher P/E ratio than SFDL: SGBLY (8.90) vs SFDL (7.42). SGBLY YTD gains are higher at: 16.554 vs. SFDL (13.206). SGBLY has higher revenues than SFDL: SGBLY (156B) vs SFDL (47.8M).
SFDLSGBLYSFDL / SGBLY
Capitalization81.3M17.8B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.20616.55480%
P/E Ratio7.428.9083%
Revenue47.8M156B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt61.3MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFDL vs SGBLY: Fundamental Ratings
SFDL
SGBLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5915
SMR RATING
1..100
571
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3144
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a22

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFDL's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGBLY (71). This means that SFDL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFDL (59). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFDL’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFDL (57). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFDL’s over the last 12 months.

SGBLY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as SFDL (50). This means that SGBLY’s stock grew similarly to SFDL’s over the last 12 months.

SFDL's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as SGBLY (44). This means that SFDL’s stock grew similarly to SGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFDLSGBLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARSSF0.69N/A
N/A
Assura Plc
KGTFF0.57N/A
N/A
Krung Thai Bank Public Co., Ltd.
AGNMF0.10N/A
N/A
AGRONOMICS LTD
FHELF0.02N/A
N/A
FIRST HELIUM INC
TCEHY63.57-0.22
-0.34%
Tencent Holding Ltd.

SFDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFDL and PVBK have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFDL and PVBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFDL
1D Price
Change %
SFDL100%
N/A
PVBK - SFDL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVAL - SFDL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
KB - SFDL
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
RWCB - SFDL
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGBLY - SFDL
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
More

SGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGBLY has been closely correlated with NDBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGBLY jumps, then NDBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGBLY
1D Price
Change %
SGBLY100%
+1.70%
NDBKY - SGBLY
67%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
HBCP - SGBLY
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
AGRPY - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TFC - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
BHKLY - SGBLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
More