SFBS
Price
$82.89
Change
+$0.84 (+1.02%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.57B
14 days until earnings call
UNTN
Price
$18.25
Change
+$0.05 (+0.27%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
13.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFBS vs UNTN

Header iconSFBS vs UNTN Comparison
Open Charts SFBS vs UNTNBanner chart's image
ServisFirst Bancshares
Price$82.89
Change+$0.84 (+1.02%)
Volume$171.49K
Capitalization3.57B
United Tennessee Bankshares
Price$18.25
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
Volume$995
Capitalization13.15M
SFBS vs UNTN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SFBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFBS vs. UNTN commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFBS is a Buy and UNTN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SFBS: $82.89 vs. UNTN: $18.25)
Brand notoriety: SFBS and UNTN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFBS: 78% vs. UNTN: 122%
Market capitalization -- SFBS: $3.57B vs. UNTN: $13.15M
SFBS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.57B. UNTN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNTN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNTN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFBS is a better buy in the long-term than UNTN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFBS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNTN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNTN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFBS is a better buy in the short-term than UNTN.

Price Growth

SFBS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.92% price change this week, while UNTN (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBS($3.57B) has a higher market cap than UNTN($13.1M). SFBS has higher P/E ratio than UNTN: SFBS (17.31) vs UNTN (5.59). UNTN YTD gains are higher at: 16.472 vs. SFBS (-0.967). SFBS has more cash in the bank: 112M vs. UNTN (9.24M). UNTN has less debt than SFBS: UNTN (1M) vs SFBS (64.7M). SFBS has higher revenues than UNTN: SFBS (427M) vs UNTN (7.49M).
SFBSUNTNSFBS / UNTN
Capitalization3.57B13.1M27,282%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.96716.472-6%
P/E Ratio17.315.59310%
Revenue427M7.49M5,700%
Total Cash112M9.24M1,212%
Total Debt64.7M1M6,470%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFBS vs UNTN: Fundamental Ratings
SFBS
UNTN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4476
SMR RATING
1..100
1374
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4330
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNTN's Valuation (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFBS (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that UNTN’s stock grew significantly faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNTN (76) in the null industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to UNTN’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNTN (74) in the null industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNTN’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNTN (50) in the null industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to UNTN’s over the last 12 months.

UNTN's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as SFBS (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that UNTN’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFBSUNTN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
25%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRUSX33.190.51
+1.56%
Bridgeway Ultra-Small Company
PGROX70.990.41
+0.58%
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth A
MLVPX19.620.11
+0.56%
MFS Low Volatility Equity R3
OINCX24.450.10
+0.41%
JPMorgan Equity Income C
TEMEX18.070.07
+0.39%
Franklin Mutual Beacon C

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with FBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then FBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
+1.02%
FBK - SFBS
90%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
ABCB - SFBS
90%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
UBSI - SFBS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
SBCF - SFBS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
SSB - SFBS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
More

UNTN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNTN has been loosely correlated with CZBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNTN jumps, then CZBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNTN
1D Price
Change %
UNTN100%
N/A
CZBC - UNTN
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FNWB - UNTN
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
SFBS - UNTN
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
FFBC - UNTN
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
FBK - UNTN
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
More