SF
Price
$114.93
Change
-$0.09 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jan 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.95B
89 days until earnings call
VIRT
Price
$38.55
Change
+$1.14 (+3.05%)
Updated
Jan 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.83B
90 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SF vs VIRT

Header iconSF vs VIRT Comparison
Open Charts SF vs VIRTBanner chart's image
Stifel Financial
Price$114.93
Change-$0.09 (-0.08%)
Volume$6.73K
Capitalization7.95B
Virtu Financial
Price$38.55
Change+$1.14 (+3.05%)
Volume$23.79K
Capitalization1.83B
SF vs VIRT Comparison Chart
Loading...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SF vs. VIRT commentary
Jan 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SF is a Hold and VIRT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 24, 2025
Stock price -- (SF: $114.95 vs. VIRT: $38.60)
Brand notoriety: SF and VIRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SF: 92% vs. VIRT: 123%
Market capitalization -- SF: $7.95B vs. VIRT: $1.83B
SF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $7.95B. VIRT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVIRT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VIRT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, VIRT is a better buy in the long-term than SF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIRT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • VIRT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than VIRT.

Price Growth

SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.78% price change this week, while VIRT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

SF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

VIRT is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.28% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($7.95B) has a higher market cap than VIRT($1.84B). SF has higher P/E ratio than VIRT: SF (18.06) vs VIRT (14.82). SF (8.362) and VIRT (8.184) have similar YTD gains . SF has less debt than VIRT: SF (1.18B) vs VIRT (5.13B). SF has higher revenues than VIRT: SF (4.29B) vs VIRT (2.29B).
SFVIRTSF / VIRT
Capitalization7.95B1.84B433%
EBITDAN/A1.05B-
Gain YTD8.3628.184102%
P/E Ratio18.0614.82122%
Revenue4.29B2.29B187%
Total CashN/A820M-
Total Debt1.18B5.13B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SF vs VIRT: Fundamental Ratings
SF
VIRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2720
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
724
SMR RATING
1..100
1058
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3517
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VIRT's Valuation (26) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SF (81). This means that VIRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VIRT (24). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VIRT (58). This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

VIRT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (39). This means that VIRT’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

VIRT's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (35). This means that VIRT’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFVIRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME28.330.68
+2.46%
GameStop Corp
SPY609.753.31
+0.55%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X103960.170000307.109380
+0.30%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL223.66-0.17
-0.08%
Apple
TSLA412.38-2.73
-0.66%
Tesla

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
-0.06%
PIPR - SF
80%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
GS - SF
77%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
EVR - SF
75%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
RJF - SF
74%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
MS - SF
72%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
More

VIRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VIRT and GS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VIRT and GS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIRT
1D Price
Change %
VIRT100%
+3.18%
GS - VIRT
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
AMRK - VIRT
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
SF - VIRT
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
RJF - VIRT
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
MS - VIRT
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
More