SF
Price
$122.04
Change
-$2.98 (-2.38%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
12.43B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VIRT
Price
$35.59
Change
-$0.42 (-1.17%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.02B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SF vs VIRT

Header iconSF vs VIRT Comparison
Open Charts SF vs VIRTBanner chart's image
Stifel Financial
Price$122.04
Change-$2.98 (-2.38%)
Volume$645.27K
Capitalization12.43B
Virtu Financial
Price$35.59
Change-$0.42 (-1.17%)
Volume$747.08K
Capitalization3.02B
SF vs VIRT Comparison Chart in %
SF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VIRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SF vs. VIRT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SF is a StrongBuy and VIRT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (SF: $125.02 vs. VIRT: $36.01)
Brand notoriety: SF and VIRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SF: 89% vs. VIRT: 64%
Market capitalization -- SF: $12.43B vs. VIRT: $3.02B
SF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $12.43B. VIRT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVIRT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VIRT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than VIRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIRT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • VIRT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than VIRT.

Price Growth

SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.65% price change this week, while VIRT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

SF is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

VIRT is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.19% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($12.4B) has a higher market cap than VIRT($3.02B). SF has higher P/E ratio than VIRT: SF (21.60) vs VIRT (7.72). SF YTD gains are higher at: 19.424 vs. VIRT (2.798). SF has less debt than VIRT: SF (1.55B) vs VIRT (8.94B). SF has higher revenues than VIRT: SF (5.06B) vs VIRT (3.38B).
SFVIRTSF / VIRT
Capitalization12.4B3.02B410%
EBITDAN/A1.72B-
Gain YTD19.4242.798694%
P/E Ratio21.607.72280%
Revenue5.06B3.38B150%
Total CashN/A752M-
Total Debt1.55B8.94B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SF vs VIRT: Fundamental Ratings
SF
VIRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3126
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1947
SMR RATING
1..100
1233
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3695
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VIRT's Valuation (23) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SF (93). This means that VIRT’s stock grew significantly faster than SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VIRT (47). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VIRT (33). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VIRT (60). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VIRT (95). This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFVIRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VIRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DHS100.950.28
+0.28%
WisdomTree US High Dividend ETF
EOT16.930.04
+0.24%
EATON VANCE NATIONAL Municipal OPPORTUNITIES TRUST
ITDC34.570.04
+0.12%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF
FFOX27.790.02
+0.07%
Fundx Future Fund Opportunities ETF
SZOXF7.01N/A
N/A
Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch)

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
+2.07%
RJF - SF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
EVR - SF
84%
Closely correlated
+2.99%
MS - SF
84%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
GS - SF
83%
Closely correlated
+3.54%
PIPR - SF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
More

VIRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIRT has been loosely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIRT jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIRT
1D Price
Change %
VIRT100%
+1.07%
SF - VIRT
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
MS - VIRT
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
LPLA - VIRT
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
NDAQ - VIRT
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
GS - VIRT
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
More